1 Title: An Infovist's Advisory; Or, Standing Athwart History Yelling, "Wait! I Like the Idea, but the Execution Needs Work!"
9 OUTLINE OF POINTS TO HIT—
11 POINTS FROM MY EMAIL TO BBL—
13 * the current situation re MtF is crazy
14 * activists who want to change society are both incentivized and selected for self-delusion—
15 * incentivized because: ... ? (Exercise: what was I thinking when I said
17 * selected-for because: ... ? (Exercise)
18 * some kind of Goodheart's-law/Berkson's-paradox-like phenomenon??
19 * Whichever activists happen to win get to write the history books, and so
20 most people end up with this Whig history view of the world where people in
21 the past were bad, bad men, but we're so much more progressive and
22 enlightened now. But evolutionarily speaking, there's no fact of the matter
23 as to what's better; there's only what won.
24 * A lot of intellectuals try to avoid politics: if your only choices are the "maximize the number of trans people" coalition vs. a "minimize the number of trans people" coalition, then it makes sense to sit it out
25 * But maybe there's a role for a more narrowly-targeted form of political
26 behavior (making friends and allies, trading favors, alienating people,
27 &c.), with the goal of just getting the correct theory (sexual dimorphism is
28 real, societies have gender roles, there are these two distinct classes of
29 motivation for why transitioning might seem like a good idea to someone) in
30 the standard sex-ed textbooks, but not trying to dictate what the social
31 norms of who should transition should be, who should pay for it,
32 &c. "Infovism" rather than activism.
34 work in my "the arc of the moral universe bends towards maximum entropy" quip!