-_ cut words from NRx denouncement Jessica discussion
-_ "I" statements
-_ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky _thinks of himself_ as having given up on Speech _in those words_"
-_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it)
-_ cut lots of words from December 2019 blogging spree
-_ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish
-_ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement)
-_ somewhere: mention that "Not Man for the Categories" keeps getting cited
-_ revise and cut words from "bad faith" section since can link to "Assume Bad Faith"
-_ cut words from January 2020 Twitter exchange (after war criminal defenses)
+_ meeting with Ray (maybe?)
+_ mention Said rigor check somewhere, nervousness about Michael's gang being a mini-egregore
+_ I should respond to Ziz's charges that my criticism of concept-policing was a form of concept-policing
+_ Anna's claim that Scott was a target specifically because he was good, my counterclaim that payment can't be impunity
+_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"?
+_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing
+_ the "reducing negativity" post does obliquely hint at the regression point being general
+_ link to protest flyer
+_ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse"? (editor might catch?)
+_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to see an obvious analogy (editor might catch?)
+_ better explanation of MOPs in "Social Reality" scuffle (editor might catch?)
+_ better context on "scam" &c. earlier (editor might catch?)
+_ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (editor might catch?)
+_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) (but it still seems clear to me on re-read?)
+_ screenshot "pleading, snarky reply"
+_ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links
+
+pt. 4 edit tier—
+✓ "Ideology Is Not the Movement" mentions not misgendering
+✓ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement)
+✓ explain why he could think of some relevant differences
+_ body odors comment
+_ emphasize that 2018 thread was policing TERF-like pronoun usage, not just disapproving of gender-based pronouns
+_ if you only say good things about Republican candidates
+_ to-be-continued ending about how being a fraud might be a good idea
+_ selective argumentation that's clearly labeled as such would be fine
+_ cite more sneers; use a footnote to pack in as many as possible
+_ Litany Against Gurus, not sure humans can think and trust at the same time; High Status and Stupidity
+_ when EY put a checkmark on my Discord message characterizing his strategy as giving up on intellectual honesty
+_ honesty and humility, HEXACO
+_ rephrase "gamete size" discussion to make it clearer that Yudkowsky's proposal also implicitly requires people to be agree about the clustering thing
+_ "Common Interest of Many Causes" and "Kolmogorov Complicity" offer directly contradictory strategies
+_ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links
+
+pt. 5 edit tier—
+_ sucking Scott's dick is helpful because he's now the main gateway instead of HPMOR
+_ Previously-on summary
+_ graf about Christiano could use a rewrite
+_ Dolphin War: after "never been published", insert "still citing it" graf
+_ Dolphin War: simplify sentence structure around "by cherry-picking the features"
+_ "Density in Thingspace" comment in Dolphin War https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/d5NyJ2Lf6N22AD9PB/where-to-draw-the-boundary
+_ quote specific exchange where I mentioned 10,000 words of philosophy that Scott was wrong—obviously the wrong play
+_ Meghan Murphy got it down to four words
+_ Dolphin War needs more Twitter links: "as Soares pointed out" needs link, "threw an eleven-Tweet tantrum" (probably screenshot), tussling
+_ replace anti-black joke with misogynist joke?
+_ end of voting conversation needs links
+_ can I rewrite to not bury the lede on "intent doesn't matter"?
+_ also reference "No such thing as a tree" in Dolphin War section
+_ better brief explanation of dark side epistemology
+_ "deep causal structure" argument needs to be crystal clear, not sloopy
+_ it's a relevant detail whether the optimization is coming from Nate
+_ probably cut the vaccine polarization paragraphs? (overheard at a party is not great sourcing, even if technically admissible)
+_ elaborate on how 2007!Yudkowsky and 2021!Xu are saying the opposite things if you just take a plain-language reading and consider, not whether individual sentences can be interpreted as "true", but what kind of _optimization_ the text is doing to the behavior of receptive readers