X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=content%2F2019%2Fpolitical-science-epigrams.md;fp=content%2Fdrafts%2Fpolitical-science-epigrams.md;h=9ae5351abf482895a7e33f8e00fabfaf999e0a76;hb=8d4077e194fbf6b5319d64a3d8e6309e7ec2dda2;hp=4856e5fcbf102e1470c3a59333b47094d48d73d0;hpb=6ae30ef74db51de541b5febfc4ce2856ef371a35;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/content/drafts/political-science-epigrams.md b/content/2019/political-science-epigrams.md
similarity index 96%
rename from content/drafts/political-science-epigrams.md
rename to content/2019/political-science-epigrams.md
index 4856e5f..9ae5351 100644
--- a/content/drafts/political-science-epigrams.md
+++ b/content/2019/political-science-epigrams.md
@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
 Title: Political Science Epigrams
-Date: 2020-01-01 
+Date: 2019-12-11 23:30
 Category: other
 Tags: cathartic, game theory
-Status: draft
 
 If your policy is, "We don't negotiate with terrorists, but we do appease bears", then from the perspective of a third party fighting a war against the bears, you look like a productive asset being farmed by the bears, and thus, a legitimate military target.