X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=notes%2Fa-hill-of-validity-sections.md;h=f0bde42acdd1043b3cfb2e40bd095fa151a608b3;hb=300131047425e4ecc3120e0fd54cf9f39473d5cc;hp=eba9ec2ded6d32382a8a4a7bf52cb504532afaca;hpb=35621170e1513beaf2b25ded00548f21d216d05d;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index eba9ec2..f0bde42 100644
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -1,18 +1,22 @@
 noncontiguous on deck—
 X reluctance to write a memoir during 2019
 X pinging Ben about memoir reluctance
+_ actually good criticism from Abram
 _ let's recap / being put in a box
+_ "duly appreciated"
 _ if he's reading this
 _ tie off reply to Xu
-_ "duly appreciated"
 _ bridge to "Challenges"
 _ Christmas party 2019 and state of Church leadership
 _ Anna vs. Michael factional conflict
+_ "fraud" as deception that moves resources
 
 
 
 with internet available—
+_ woke filter bubble thinking, stopped talking to Michael when he went that way https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1435619618052214787
 _ "praise Ba'al" language from "Rationalist Blogging"
+_ disclaimer on "Categories Were Made"
 _ update "Argue Politics" link to Sarah's static site
 _ link simulacrum posts: Zvi (he has a category), Elizabeth, at least one more from Ben
 _ examples of snarky comments about "the rationalists" 
@@ -25,6 +29,7 @@ _ report comment count "Blegg Mode" trainwreck
 
 
 far editing tier—
+_ I'm sure Eliezer Yudkowsky could think of some relevant differences
 _ clarify why Michael thought Scott was "gaslighting" me, include "beeseech bowels of Christ"
 _ conversation with Ben about physical injuries (this is important because it explains where the "cut my dick off rhetoric" came from)
 _ address the "maybe it's good to be called names" point from "Hill" thread
@@ -1076,3 +1081,6 @@ I furthermore claim that the following disjunction is true:
 > You have no grounds to criticize me for calling it a blatant lie, because there's no rule of rationality that says I shouldn't draw the category boundaries of "blatant lie" that way.
 
 there needs to be _some_ way for _someone_ to invest a _finite_ amount of effort to _correct the mistake_
+
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1404698587175350275
+> That Zack now imagines this to be a great trend [...] does seem like an avoidable error and a failure to take perspective on how much most people's lives are not about ourselves