X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=notes%2Fnotes.txt;h=151ac13ce1fcf79ad960c22fb28b0884872eebd6;hb=c50b9884b2be31aedaa79a72e67e00ad79487786;hp=53ab1fa0abc0c5c7aaf0979acb38faca0176d1f0;hpb=1403f894675390fafe695545a763f8a0a447a78c;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index 53ab1fa..151ac13 100644
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -2836,3 +2836,8 @@ https://wyclif.substack.com/p/biorxiv-wouldnt-host-our-paper-on
 
 "Impact Protection Potential of Mammalian Hair: Testing the Pugilism Hypothesis for the Evolution of Human Facial Hair"
 https://academic.oup.com/iob/article/2/1/obaa005/5799080
+
+autoponyphilia: http://pone.tf/
+
+Evidence of meta-attraction from "We Have Better Graphs" (2007)—
+OTOH there is no sum I would accept to become attracted to men, unless you _also_ made me a woman. (I should add that in that case I would have to meet a man who was a straight woman who made the reciprocal bargain.) So do I then have an erotic identity but _not_ a gender identity? Absurd!—but so obviously right?