X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;ds=sidebyside;f=notes%2Fnotes.txt;h=8e5858b76172ee7c12b4cb732144b597543e04d5;hb=10c87d2f1f5b90f63c1094beb98b33583e752d5a;hp=d71bccec8c8285289e24f962e205e5e0acca6cfd;hpb=86dabfe46a9ec248c5d9e82a316d9cc4d0b1a254;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index d71bcce..8e5858b 100644
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -2775,3 +2775,5 @@ If I had known that the kid specifically liked Barbies, or was generally effemin
 > there *isn't* a good reason to push back against calling the Barbie a Barbie instead of calling it a girl toy
 
 Policy debates should not appear one-sided. "It's being clear about why the restaurant is offering two, and only two, and specifically these two, toy choices" is a reason. Liberal anti-gender-role individualists like us don't think it's a sufficiently strong reason to outweigh the externality, but the concern about externalities is value-laden; protesting, "Oh, I'm only asking you to be _specific_, no ideological agenda here!" would be a lie.
+
+More small world: CronoDAS (a LWer) on /r/slaythespire https://www.reddit.com/r/slaythespire/comments/p92011/my_first_defect_heart_kill_ascension_6/