X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fa-hill-of-meaning-sections.md;h=e9b424050f7e8f0c4b9bbad500eb6a3a01669ccb;hb=930b7cac2796ba432fee138ee8175f467bd3730e;hp=347896360ef40496f6a3045dd4038440f02a2cc1;hpb=9489e5351246d3be0fb874b2ea1d00d29d219141;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-meaning-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-meaning-sections.md
index 3478963..e9b4240 100644
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-meaning-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-meaning-sections.md
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxZBrbVqZnU
 I realize it wasn't personal—no one _consciously_ thinking "I'm going to trick autogynpehilic men into cutting their dicks off", but
 
 the most recent pronoun update
-https://www.facebook.com/yudkowsky/posts/10159421750419228
+https://www.facebook.com/yudkowsky/posts/10159421750419228 
 
 > I would not know how to write a different viewpoint as a sympathetic character.
 [...]
@@ -374,4 +374,8 @@ https://archive.is/Ecsca
 my rationalist community has people asking a lot of questions already answered by my community's name
 
 cite to "Not Especially Related to Transgender"
-https://twitter.com/fortenforge/status/1402057829142302721
\ No newline at end of file
+https://twitter.com/fortenforge/status/1402057829142302721
+
+"Hero Licensing": to provide an earnest-token of all the techniques I couldn't show
+
+uncritically (uncharacteristically uncritically) taking the newly-ascendant gender-identity theory for granted ("lots of women wouldn't be particularly disturbed if they had a male body; the ones we know as 'trans' are just the ones with unusually strong female gender identities"), without considering the obvious-in-retrospect hypothesis that "guy who speculates about his female analogue on a transhumanist mailing list in 2004" and "guy who thinks he might be a trans women in Berkeley 2016" are the same guy.