X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fa-hill-of-validity-sections.md;h=07ff3267f1537921ede77c1a9938d696466bde23;hb=ee42bec2ebfab650a87e8d546d81cd675ade472f;hp=59c6b639746fc957b9463cb413f35bfb198f894c;hpb=a70e029bfeb9bafeedc585ff552c74f93efe31ff;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index 59c6b63..07ff326 100644
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -13,6 +13,10 @@ _ screenshot Rob's Facebook comment which I link
 _ explain first use of Center for Applied Rationality
 _ erasing agency of Michael's friends, construed as a pawn
 _ Anna thought badmouthing Michael was OK by Michael's standards
+_ chat with "Wilhelm" during March 2019 minor psych episode
+_ explain the adversarial pressure on privacy norms
+_ first EY contact was asking for public clarification or "I am being silenced" (so Glomarizing over "unsatisfying response" or no response isn't leaking anything Yudkowksy cares about)
+_ mention the fact that Anna had always taken a "What You Can't Say" strategy
 
 people to consult before publishing, for feedback or right of objection—
 _ Iceman
@@ -20,9 +24,14 @@ _ Ben/Jessica
 _ Scott
 _ Anna
 _ secret posse member
-_ someone from Alicorner #drama as a hostile prereader
+_ someone from Alicorner #drama as a hostile prereader (Swimmer?)
+_ Kelsey (very briefly, just about her name)
 (probably don't bother with Michael?)
 
+things to bring up in consultation emails—
+_ dropping "and Scott" in Jessica's description of attacking narcissim
+_ I think it's OK to copy my friend's language from emails; plagiarism instincts
+
 
 -------
 
@@ -1067,8 +1076,6 @@ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mmHctwkKjpvaQdC3c/what-should-you-change-in-resp
 
 The HEXACO personality model considers "honesty" and "humility" a single factor
 
-I'm not usually—at least, not always—so much of a scrub as to play chess with a pigeon (which shits on the board and then struts around like it's won), or wrestle with a pig (which gets you both dirty, and the pig likes it), or dispute what the Tortise said to Achilles
-
 (You might group things together _on the grounds_ of their similarly positive consequences—that's what words like _good_ do—but that's distinct from choosing _the categorization itself_ because of its consequences.)
 
 —and would be unforgivable if it weren't so _inexplicable_.
@@ -1163,3 +1170,8 @@ https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1356493440041684993
 We don't believe in privacy 
 > Privacy-related social norms are optimized for obscuring behavior that could be punished if widely known [...] an example of a paradoxical norm that is opposed to enforcement of norms-in-general").
 https://unstableontology.com/2021/04/12/on-commitments-to-anti-normativity/
+
+Sucking up the the Blue Egregore would make sense if you _knew_ that was the critical resource
+https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mmHctwkKjpvaQdC3c/what-should-you-change-in-response-to-an-emergency-and-ai
+
+I don't think I can use Ben's "Eliza the spambot therapist" analogy because it relies on the "running out the clock" behavior, and I'm Glomarizing 
\ No newline at end of file