X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fa-hill-of-validity-sections.md;h=07ff3267f1537921ede77c1a9938d696466bde23;hb=ee42bec2ebfab650a87e8d546d81cd675ade472f;hp=8bbfad6f339150bb316dcc2bccd6f8dffc08beed;hpb=f32aea7316333933e09fb4953f3542aedcc21940;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md index 8bbfad6..07ff326 100644 --- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md +++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md @@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ _ erasing agency of Michael's friends, construed as a pawn _ Anna thought badmouthing Michael was OK by Michael's standards _ chat with "Wilhelm" during March 2019 minor psych episode _ explain the adversarial pressure on privacy norms +_ first EY contact was asking for public clarification or "I am being silenced" (so Glomarizing over "unsatisfying response" or no response isn't leaking anything Yudkowksy cares about) +_ mention the fact that Anna had always taken a "What You Can't Say" strategy people to consult before publishing, for feedback or right of objection— _ Iceman @@ -22,9 +24,14 @@ _ Ben/Jessica _ Scott _ Anna _ secret posse member -_ someone from Alicorner #drama as a hostile prereader +_ someone from Alicorner #drama as a hostile prereader (Swimmer?) +_ Kelsey (very briefly, just about her name) (probably don't bother with Michael?) +things to bring up in consultation emails— +_ dropping "and Scott" in Jessica's description of attacking narcissim +_ I think it's OK to copy my friend's language from emails; plagiarism instincts + ------- @@ -1069,8 +1076,6 @@ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mmHctwkKjpvaQdC3c/what-should-you-change-in-resp The HEXACO personality model considers "honesty" and "humility" a single factor -I'm not usually—at least, not always—so much of a scrub as to play chess with a pigeon (which shits on the board and then struts around like it's won), or wrestle with a pig (which gets you both dirty, and the pig likes it), or dispute what the Tortise said to Achilles - (You might group things together _on the grounds_ of their similarly positive consequences—that's what words like _good_ do—but that's distinct from choosing _the categorization itself_ because of its consequences.) —and would be unforgivable if it weren't so _inexplicable_. @@ -1168,3 +1173,5 @@ https://unstableontology.com/2021/04/12/on-commitments-to-anti-normativity/ Sucking up the the Blue Egregore would make sense if you _knew_ that was the critical resource https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mmHctwkKjpvaQdC3c/what-should-you-change-in-response-to-an-emergency-and-ai + +I don't think I can use Ben's "Eliza the spambot therapist" analogy because it relies on the "running out the clock" behavior, and I'm Glomarizing \ No newline at end of file