X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fa-hill-of-validity-sections.md;h=35d0c9108e743e5c61a6550310fc6d5725a4f7a4;hb=a03ff4f52b792a4e74b41bdf91ca83604a029254;hp=f0303111b7c04d7575854d622f5d4f7fcfdc9bae;hpb=7b3fd116179347cbee749e1a1ba2d144b1b954d4;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index f030311..35d0c91 100644
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -5,14 +5,17 @@ _ talk about the 2019 Christmas party
 _ Let's recap
 _ If he's reading this ...
 _ Perhaps if the world were at stake
+_ ¶ about social justice and defying threats
 _ ¶ about body odors
 _ regrets and wasted time
 _ excerpt 2nd "out of patience" email
 
 
 with internet available—
+_ "watchful waiting"
 _ in "especially galling" §: from "Changing Emotions"—"somehow it's always about sex when men are involved"—he even correctly pinpointing AGP in ordinary men (as was obvious back then), just without the part that AGP _is_ "trans"
 _ "look at what ended up happening"—look up whether that exact quote from from http://www.hpmor.com/chapter/47 or https://www.hpmor.com/chapter/97
+_ Discord history with Scott (leading up to 2019 Christmas party, and deferring to Tailcalled on SSC survey question wording)
 _ Gallileo "And yet it moves"
 _ Discord logs before Austin retreat
 _ examples of snarky comments about "the rationalists" 
@@ -38,7 +41,6 @@ _ address the "maybe it's good to be called names" point from "Hill" thread
 _ explain "court ruling" earlier
 _ 2019 Discord discourse with Alicorner
 _ edit discussion of "anti-trans" side given that I later emphasize that "sides" shouldn't be a thing
-_ first appearance of "Caliphate"
 _ explain the adversarial pressure on privacy norms
 _ first EY contact was asking for public clarification or "I am being silenced" (so Glomarizing over "unsatisfying response" or no response isn't leaking anything Yudkowksy cares about)
 _ Nov. 2018 continues thread from Oct. 2016 conversation
@@ -48,8 +50,6 @@ _ clarify sequence of outreach attempts
 _ clarify existence of a shadow posse member
 _ mention Nov. 2018 conversation with Ian somehow; backref on bidding for attention again; subject line from Happy Price 2016
 _ Said on Yudkowsky's retreat to Facebook being bad for him
-_ explain first use of "rationalist"
-_ explain first use of Center for Applied Rationality
 _ erasing agency of Michael's friends, construed as a pawn
 _ mention the fact that Anna had always taken a "What You Can't Say" strategy
 _ when to use first _vs. last names
@@ -57,7 +57,14 @@ _ explain why I'm not being charitable in 2018 thread analysis, that at the time
 _ January 2019 meeting with Ziz and Gwen
 _ better summary of Littman
 _ explain Rob
-_ explain or omit first mention of "egregore"
+
+
+terms to explain on first mention—
+_ "Caliphate"
+_ "rationalist"
+_ Center for Applied Rationality
+_ MIRI
+_ "egregore"
 
 
 people to consult before publishing, for feedback or right of objection—
@@ -1081,17 +1088,18 @@ https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1404821285276774403
 > It is not trans-specific. When people tell me I helped them, I mostly believe them and am happy.
 ]
 
-
 https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/cyzXoCv7nagDWCMNS/you-re-calling-who-a-cult-leader#35n
 > In fact, I would say that by far the most cultish-looking behavior on Hacker News is people trying to show off how willing they are to disagree with Paul Graham
 I'm totally still doing this
 
 > it's that it's hard to get that innocence back, once you even start thinking about whether you're _independent_ of someone
 
-
 If Scott's willing to link to A. Marinos, maybe he'd link to my memoir, too? https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/open-thread-242
 My reaction to Marinos is probably similar to a lot of people's reaction to me: geez, putting in so much effort to correct Scott's mistake is lame, what a loser, who cares
 
+This is the same mechanism as "Unnatural Categories Are Optimized for Deception"!!
+> journalism is usually trustworthy because trustworthiness is the carrier vehicle. It's occasionally corrupt, because corruption is the payload.
+https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/lje3nu/statement_on_new_york_times_article/gnfrprx/?context=3
 
 --------