X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fchallenges-notes.md;fp=notes%2Fchallenges-notes.md;h=2fb5612471fa9e738b9b951154182f802336b4ca;hb=3bec30b88547dc92385bcd7534a6e4cc1825cfd2;hp=20199b98273b3c033e3273665cce6cda397be36b;hpb=f6344c10707581308aff24e62f0878f98a5c90fd;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/challenges-notes.md b/notes/challenges-notes.md
index 20199b9..2fb5612 100644
--- a/notes/challenges-notes.md
+++ b/notes/challenges-notes.md
@@ -10,9 +10,10 @@ Fit in somewhere—
  * Aella https://knowingless.com/2019/06/06/side-effects-of-preferred-pronouns/
  * "gamete size"—this is a tic where everyone knows what sex is, but no one is allowed to acknowledge the cluster  
  * maybe worth explaining why I keep saying "sex category" instead of "gender"—and be consistent about it
+ * transition interventions are bundled
  * I need to acknowledge the
-
 > In a wide variety of cases, sure, they can clearly communicate the unambiguous sex and gender of something that has an unambiguous sex and gender, much as a different language might have pronouns that sometimes clearly communicated hair color to the extent that hair color often fell into unambiguous clusters.
+ * maybe by "much more strongly ... different firm attachments", he's pointing to different people having different intuitions about what male/female clusters map to; that's definitely a thing, but it's wrong to conflate that with "Maybe it's like not being named Oliver"; people do agree on the approximate meaning of blue and green even if there are edge cases, cite fallacy of gray
 
 -----