X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fchallenges-notes.md;h=c724929a78e1a3bfe59faa103694c3d963fab27b;hb=7fa4a714cbae569be20e2453e00a34fa6746f5fd;hp=8907576102fc34767e419c80f184c2e1f3c2f3b8;hpb=ae7e1599ebab9167ab1a23c5a55d2a0502403824;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/challenges-notes.md b/notes/challenges-notes.md
index 8907576..c724929 100644
--- a/notes/challenges-notes.md
+++ b/notes/challenges-notes.md
@@ -18,15 +18,30 @@ Fit in somewhere—
 
  * need introductory sentence before first reference to "we" or "the community"
 
-4 levels of intellectual conversation https://rationalconspiracy.com/2017/01/03/four-layers-of-intellectual-conversation/
+ * it is merited to touch on the nearest-unblocked strategy history somewhere in this piece, even if I may also need to write a longer "A Hill of Validity"
+ * also need a short statement of what I'm fighting for (AGPs are factually not women, and a culture that insists that everyone needs to lie to protect our feelings is bad for our own intellectual development; I want the things I said in "Sexual Dimorphism" to be the standard story, rather than my weird heresy)
+
+* need to stress that EY isn't surrendering to progressives in the straightforward way of normal academics; instead, he's trying to put on a Pretending-to-Be-Wise above-it-all independent centrist act (while being careful not to say anything that would make progs _really_ mad)
 
+ * my "self-ID is a Schelling Point" and "On the Argumentative Form" show that I'm not a partisan hack (maybe also publish a brief version of )
 
-> But Twitter is at least not *ontologically confused* if they say that using preferred pronouns is courtesy, and claim that they're enforcing a courtesy standard. Replying "That's a lie! I will never lie!" is confused.
-https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1067302082481274880
+ * I'm only doing what _he_ taught me to do
+
+4 levels of intellectual conversation https://rationalconspiracy.com/2017/01/03/four-layers-of-intellectual-conversation/
+
+> I find the "(chromosomes?)" here very amusing. I am also a Yudkowskian, Eliezer; "female human" is a cluster in thingspace :)
+https://twitter.com/EnyeWord/status/1068983389716385792
 
 > Lying about atheism, in a conv about atheism, is defecting in a coop effort about atheism.
 https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1226605895091507200
 
+Twitter comments about "despite all my attempts to narrow it"
+
+Trying to turn me into a Jane Austen character
+
+https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/ax695frGJEzGxFBK4/biology-inspired-agi-timelines-the-trick-that-never-works
+> But I suppose I cannot but acknowledge that my outward behavior seems to reveal a distribution whose median seems to fall well before 2050.
+
 More Yudkowsky playing dumb—
 
 > What separates your stance from "I consider 'parmesan' to refer to only cheese from the Parma region in Italy and I don't appreciate being asked to lie"?
@@ -125,3 +140,13 @@ The Sequences taught me some really important things about sex differences and w
 The ]
 
 https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/bounded-distrust
+
+If "rationalists" are both a social cluster, and seekers of systematically-correct-reasoning, then people trying to protect the power and prestige of the social cluster face an incentive to invent fake epistemology lessons when the correct answer is unpopular! That's fatal!! 
+
+If someone fires back bad faith allegations at me and is prepared to defend them, that's actually more invigorating and productive than the Berkeley equilibrium
+
+I don't think I'm setting [my price for joining](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Q8evewZW5SeidLdbA/your-price-for-joining) particularly high here?
+
+[principled trans people should be offended, too!]
+
+[our beliefs about dolphins are downstream of Scott's political incentives]