X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fhuman-diversity-notes.md;h=a0a08fe72b8263716a2bd1808cb76aa185c416f6;hb=eacdf480cda9ae36256f277cac2ca2734c1332b2;hp=c7860ca71f6a7972fea8c26629f778f12520ae19;hpb=62cb687fdadda8da0029b355dcf1b70fa2ab8547;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/human-diversity-notes.md b/notes/human-diversity-notes.md
index c7860ca..a0a08fe 100644
--- a/notes/human-diversity-notes.md
+++ b/notes/human-diversity-notes.md
@@ -141,9 +141,18 @@ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/DoPo4PDjgSySquHX8/heads-i-win-tails-never-heard-
 
 https://meltingasphalt.com/crony-beliefs/
 
+ And, again, socio-psychological facts like character assessments are precisely those for which we have the _most_ reason to distrust each other's judgement: if I like Mary, I might say favorable but false things about her even if I would never tell a lie about homotopy groups. In the absence of a objectively calibrated compassion-o-meter, psychological scientists who want to study individual differences in compassion are mostly limited to doing statistics on people's verbal self-reports and other-reports—but if you don't trust what people _say_, it's at least not _obvious_ whether or how much more you should trust statistical analyses of what people say, in accordance with the ancient dictum: ["garbage in, garbage out."](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garbage_in,_garbage_out) Probably the neuroscientists are working on the compassion-o-meter, but they too face the problem of ensuring that their interpretations of their brain scans actually mean what they say they mean.
+
 ------
 
+This was the linkpost description text I initially drafted, before deciding that the "Straussian coyness" I [occasionally]() [succumb]() to is ultimately unbecoming.
+
 A Book Review
 
 Someone wrote a blog post reviewing a book by some sociologist named Murray. Never heard of him. Anyway, I couldn't get through the whole thing because the reviewer has this _really obnoxious_ writing style that uses way too many italics and exclamation points (as well as occasional weirdly out-of-place cuss words?!), but I did notice that he (?) links to _Less Wrong_ a few times (!), which is something I don't see "in the wild" very often these days, so I thought it couldn't hurt to share the link here in case one of you happens to find it interesting??
 
+------
+
+Book Review—Charles Murray's Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class
+
+New on my secret ("secret") blog: a review of the new Charles Murray book about the science of sex and race differences, including a discussion of some philosophical, psychological, and game-theoretic reasons this stuff is so hard to talk about!