X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fmemoir-sections.md;h=31f8a07136f11a5b2b9fe669cfdddf1e082907be;hb=09055d7de6717aa99bc97d081780c6af94a7fe19;hp=faa942d5945172907703939679e2b4d594c5f632;hpb=cc86a628f55435ee36574ab72d3132febb6f80bb;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index faa942d..31f8a07 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -1,17 +1,33 @@ -Said revisions— - -"deliberately ambiguous" → "ambiguous for a reason" -923 words about bad faith +pt. 4 edit tier— +✓ "A Fire" § title +_ revise the start of §6 to say he came by core pronoun stance honestly +_ revise "too good a writer" to be more explicit "someone could be that naive" +_ footnote about how I could be blamed for being too credulous +_ say that explicitly, up front, at the start of that … chunk. +_ edit post to clarify "nudging the cognition" +_ revise start of §6 to say that +_ look for a place to link "Faction formation" +_ Tail's objection to FFS example +_ Brennan "everyone else should participate" needs more wording adjustments +_ the mailing list post noted it as a "common sexual fantasy" +_ Sept. 2020 clarification noted that a distinction should be made between +_ emphasize that 2018 thread was policing TERF-like pronoun usage, not just disapproving of gender-based pronouns +_ https://cognition.cafe/p/on-lies-and-liars +_ cite more sneers; use a footnote to pack in as many as possible +_ Dawkins and Jerry Coyne and https://www.thefp.com/p/carole-hooven-why-i-left-harvard time-sensitive globals TODOs— -✓ apply pro edit pt. 4 -✓ section headers for pt. 4 -✓ apply red team pt. 4 -_ rewrite pt. 4 +✓ consult Said +✓ patriate-links script TODOs +_ remaining pt. 4 edit tier +_ draft Twitter thread +_ draft #drama strategy comments _ consult Anna -_ consult Said -_ publish pt. 4 +_ #drama strategy session +_ bully Jeff Ladish +_ PUBLISH pt. 4!! +-------- _ finish pt. 5 _ address auto edit tier to pt. 5 @@ -22,36 +38,11 @@ _ apply pro edit pt. 5 ✓ consult Tail -_ bully Jeff Ladish -_ #drama strategy session _ consult lc _ consult David Xu _ psychiatric disaster private doc - -pt. 4 edit tier— -✓ "Ideology Is Not the Movement" mentions not misgendering -✓ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement) -✓ explain why he could think of some relevant differences -✓ rephrase "gamete size" discussion to make it clearer that Yudkowsky's proposal also implicitly requires people to be agree about the clustering thing -✓ honesty and humility, HEXACO -✓ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links -✓ ending qualifications on "fraud" and whether it might be a good idea -✓ selective argumentation that's clearly labeled as such would be fine -✓ if you only say good things about Republican candidates -✓ he used to be worthy of trust ---- -_ look for a place to link "Faction formation" -_ Tail's objection to FFS example -_ the mailing list post noted it as a "common sexual fantasy" -_ Sept. 2020 clarification noted that a distinction should be made between -_ emphasize that 2018 thread was policing TERF-like pronoun usage, not just disapproving of gender-based pronouns -_ https://cognition.cafe/p/on-lies-and-liars -_ cite more sneers; use a footnote to pack in as many as possible -_ Dawkins and Jerry Coyne and https://www.thefp.com/p/carole-hooven-why-i-left-harvard - - pt. 5 edit tier— ✓ sucking Scott's dick is helpful because he's now the main gateway instead of HPMOR _ Previously-on summary @@ -2833,3 +2824,9 @@ https://twitter.com/pawnofcthulhu/status/1680840089285582848 > "arguing about metaphysics is boring; letting people chose pronouns as part of self-expression seems like a thing a free society should allow for the same reason we should let people choose clothes; for many social purposes trans women are in fact empirically women" (If your "moderately serious" plan for survival is ["AI research journals banned, people violating that ban hunted down with partial effectiveness"](https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1739705063768232070), that might be your least-bad option as a consequentialist, but one of the things your consequentialist calculation should take into account is that you've declared war on people who want to do AI science on Earth.) + +public intellectual death +https://scholars-stage.org/public-intellectuals-have-short-shelf-lives-but-why/ + +> "Racism" is so commonly used weirdly that I think there are few circumstances left where I'd try to use the word to communicate. Instead I'd say, "X seems to be judging people negatively in a hard-to-shake-off way based on their skin color." +https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1755624226550387013