X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fmemoir-sections.md;h=42c0dab5e51c346172113b586eb3fe355bff32f7;hb=31ae82a297387a96ecf57aac397363fcface8b6e;hp=377fe3fc1dda42ed9924f63b0dbc2c09d7e4febc;hpb=86a4ebdafe6ed89c483bb2f7de263a528de7ae08;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index 377fe3f..42c0dab 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -1,12 +1,32 @@ +pt. 4 edit tier— +✓ "A Fire" § title +✓ revise "too good a writer" to be more explicit "someone could be that naive" +_ footnote about how I could be blamed for being too credulous? +_ say that explicitly, up front, at the start of that … chunk. +_ edit post to clarify "nudging the cognition" +_ Tail's objection to FFS example +_ Brennan "everyone else should participate" needs more wording adjustments +_ the mailing list post noted it as a "common sexual fantasy" +_ Sept. 2020 clarification noted that a distinction should be made between +_ emphasize that 2018 thread was policing TERF-like pronoun usage, not just disapproving of gender-based pronouns +_ look for a place to link http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/ +_ look for a place to link https://cognition.cafe/p/on-lies-and-liars +_ cite more sneers; use a footnote to pack in as many as possible +_ Dawkins and Jerry Coyne and https://www.thefp.com/p/carole-hooven-why-i-left-harvard +_ make sure I'm summarizing "Challenges" appropriately + time-sensitive globals TODOs— -✓ apply pro edit pt. 4 -✓ section headers for pt. 4 -✓ apply red team pt. 4 -_ rewrite pt. 4 +✓ consult Said +✓ patriate-links script TODOs +- remaining pt. 4 edit tier +- draft #drama strategy opening remarks _ consult Anna -_ consult Said -_ publish pt. 4 +_ draft Twitter thread +_ #drama strategy session +_ bully Jeff Ladish +_ PUBLISH pt. 4!! +-------- _ finish pt. 5 _ address auto edit tier to pt. 5 @@ -17,75 +37,11 @@ _ apply pro edit pt. 5 ✓ consult Tail -_ bully Jeff Ladish -_ #drama strategy session - -_ Manifold: Will Yudkowsky reply to "Agreeing With Stalin in Ways That Exhibit Generally Rationalist Principles" in a way that a 2008 Overcoming Bias reader would consider non-evasive, as judged by Vaniver? -_ ask Jimrandomh about attack times _ consult lc _ consult David Xu _ psychiatric disaster private doc - -pt. 3 edit tier (auto edition)— -✓ FTX aside footnote version -✓ revert alphabet names (from 17638259f20) -✓ narcissistic delusions -✓ clarify that cheerful price history is with Anna specifically -✓ screenshot "pleading, snarky reply" -✓ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links -✓ return on cognitive investment -✓ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse" (posse) -✓ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite" -✓ log2 with an 'o' -✓ yank note about LW comment policy to top-level -✓ "Common Interest of Many Causes" and "Kolmogorov Complicity" offer directly contradictory strategies -✓ re-check wording of trans-kids-on-the-margin section -_ briefly speculate on causes of brain damage in footnote? -_ "consensus behavior" anti-school complaint could be stronger -------- -_ Ruby fight included ban threat, "forces of blandness want me gone ... stand my ground" remark -_ breakup song -_ being friends with dogs (it's good, but do I have the wordcount budget?) -_ mention that I was miffed about "Boundaries?" not getting Curated, while one of Euk's animal posts did -_ explicitly mention http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/bad-faith-behavior-not-feeling/ -_ meeting with Ray (6/29) -_ mention Said rigor check somewhere, nervousness about Michael's gang being a mini-egregore -_ I should respond to Ziz's charges that my criticism of concept-policing was a form of concept-policing -_ Anna's claim that Scott was a target specifically because he was good, my counterclaim that payment can't be impunity -_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing -_ the "reducing negativity" post does obliquely hint at the regression point being general -_ link to protest flyer -_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to see an obvious analogy (editor might catch?) -_ better explanation of MOPs in "Social Reality" scuffle (editor might catch?) -_ better context on "scam" &c. earlier (editor might catch?) -_ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (editor might catch?) -_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) (but it still seems clear to me on re-read?) - - -pt. 4 edit tier— -✓ "Ideology Is Not the Movement" mentions not misgendering -✓ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement) -✓ explain why he could think of some relevant differences -✓ rephrase "gamete size" discussion to make it clearer that Yudkowsky's proposal also implicitly requires people to be agree about the clustering thing -✓ honesty and humility, HEXACO -✓ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links -✓ ending qualifications on "fraud" and whether it might be a good idea -✓ selective argumentation that's clearly labeled as such would be fine -✓ if you only say good things about Republican candidates -✓ he used to be worthy of trust ---- -_ look for a place to link "Faction formation" -_ Tail's objection to FFS example -_ the mailing list post noted it as a "common sexual fantasy" -_ Sept. 2020 clarification noted that a distinction should be made between -_ emphasize that 2018 thread was policing TERF-like pronoun usage, not just disapproving of gender-based pronouns -_ https://cognition.cafe/p/on-lies-and-liars -_ cite more sneers; use a footnote to pack in as many as possible -_ Dawkins and Jerry Coyne - - pt. 5 edit tier— ✓ sucking Scott's dick is helpful because he's now the main gateway instead of HPMOR _ Previously-on summary @@ -1402,6 +1358,8 @@ Still citing it (19 Sep 22): https://twitter.com/ingalala/status/156839169106472 https://arbital.greaterwrong.com/p/logical_dt/?l=5gc It even leaked into Big Yud!!! "Counterfactuals were made for humanity, not humanity for counterfactuals." +Still citing it (13 Feb 24): https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/kSq5qiafd6SqQoJWv/technologies-and-terminology-ai-isn-t-software-it-s-deepware + At least I don't have to link the rebuttal myself every time: https://www.datasecretslox.com/index.php/topic,1553.msg38755.html https://old.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/10vx6gk/the_categories_were_made_for_man_not_man_for_the/j7k8fjc/ @@ -2857,3 +2815,19 @@ What if, in addition to physical punishments and Detect Thoughts, Cheliax also h > One thing is sure, the path that leads to sanity and survival doesn't start with lies or with reasoning by Appeal to (Internal) Consequences. https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1743522277835333865 + +> To clarify a possibly misunderstood point: On my model, dath ilan's institutions only work because they're inhabited by dath ilani. Dath ilani invent good institutions even if they grow up in Earth; Governance on Earth lasts three days before Earth voters screw it up. +https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1565516610286211072 + +July 2023 +https://twitter.com/pawnofcthulhu/status/1680840089285582848 +> man i feel like the orthodox viewpoint on this has moved on from "let's define trans women as women" to like +> "arguing about metaphysics is boring; letting people chose pronouns as part of self-expression seems like a thing a free society should allow for the same reason we should let people choose clothes; for many social purposes trans women are in fact empirically women" + +(If your "moderately serious" plan for survival is ["AI research journals banned, people violating that ban hunted down with partial effectiveness"](https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1739705063768232070), that might be your least-bad option as a consequentialist, but one of the things your consequentialist calculation should take into account is that you've declared war on people who want to do AI science on Earth.) + +public intellectual death +https://scholars-stage.org/public-intellectuals-have-short-shelf-lives-but-why/ + +> "Racism" is so commonly used weirdly that I think there are few circumstances left where I'd try to use the word to communicate. Instead I'd say, "X seems to be judging people negatively in a hard-to-shake-off way based on their skin color." +https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1755624226550387013