X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fmemoir-sections.md;h=55749b58593959c838822f86e139f3614bc52914;hb=a2ca8ef1fde9054ba8cc5a3d3b3180a0d8a0f3a4;hp=77d78eb1bfd1b87f86062c89cee622d8224ba4f2;hpb=1c4be9a714deacdfe311d4838e9975e339c237b8;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index 77d78eb..55749b5 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -20,30 +20,30 @@ pt. 3 edit tier— ✓ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky thinks of himself ✓ cut words from December 2019 blogging spree ✓ mention "Darkest Timeline" and Skyrms somewhere ------ + +pt. 3 content fills— +✓ the skeptical family friend's view +✓ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish +_ confusing people and ourselves about what the exact crime is +_ footnote explaining quibbles on clarification +_ FTX validated Ben's view of EA!! + +pt. 3 minor— +✓ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray _ Ben on "locally coherent coordination": use direct quotes for Ben's language—maybe rewrite in my own language (footnote?) as an understanding test -_ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray +_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"? +_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing +_ link to protest flyer +_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy _ better explanation of MOPs in "Social Reality" scuffle _ better context on "scam" &c. earlier -_ meeting with Ray? _ mention that I was miffed about "Boundaries?" not getting Curated, while one of Euk's animal posts did _ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse"? _ LessWrong vs. GreaterWrong for comment links? _ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (if people want to read them, they can click through ... but on review, these descriptions seem pretty reasonable?) _ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) (but it still seems clear to me on re-read?) -_ I still mostly feel like being more detailed than "fraud"; later thoughts on jump to evaluation, translating between different groups' language -_ FTX validated Ben's view of EA!! _ explicitly mention http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/bad-faith-behavior-not-feeling/ -------- -_ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish -_ choice quotes in "end of the Category War" thank you note -_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"? -_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing -_ footnote explaining quibbles? (the first time I tried to write this, I hesitated, not sure if necessary) -_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy -_ first mention of Jack G. should introduce him properly -_ link to protest flyer - +_ meeting with Ray (maybe?) pt. 4 edit tier— _ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement) @@ -72,12 +72,13 @@ _ clarify that Keltham infers there are no mascochists, vs. Word of God _ "Doublethink" ref in Xu discussion should mention that Word of God Eliezerfic clarification that it's not about telling others _ https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/vvc2MiZvWgMFaSbhx/book-review-the-bell-curve-by-charles-murray/comment/git7xaE2aHfSZyLzL + things to discuss with Michael/Ben/Jessica— _ Anna on Paul Graham _ Yudkowsky thinking reasoning wasn't useful -_ Michael's SLAPP against REACH -_ Michael on creepy and crazy men -_ elided Sasha disaster +_ Michael's SLAPP against REACH (new) +_ Michael on creepy and crazy men (new) +_ elided Sasha disaster (new) pt. 3–5 prereaders— @@ -89,7 +90,6 @@ _ Steven Kaas _ David Xu _ Ray _ Ruby -_ Teortaxes? (he might be interested) _ Alicorner #drama ("Is anyone interested in offering political advice or 'hostile advice'")