X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fmemoir-sections.md;h=6e6a370043a0d8a39f2e64b3e03640acf6875476;hb=21e6c3f1de35997a5c4eda839883295b67363c24;hp=9c7b2f006e56f00edc89d8218863051b7ce0789c;hpb=79a6442952c4b0cc6f088e71a858cf1c3902cfae;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index 9c7b2f0..6e6a370 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ Notes from pt. 3–6 readthrough (post publication of pt. 1–2)— _ fullname Taylor and Hoffman at start of pt. 3 +_ footnote clarifying that "Riley" and Sarah weren't core members of the group, despite being included on some emails? _ be more specific about Ben's anti-EA and Jessica's anti-MIRI things, perhaps in footnotes _ Ben on "locally coherent coordination": use direct quotes for Ben's language—maybe rewrite in my own language (footnote?) as an understanding test _ set context for "EA Has a Lying Problem" (written by Sarah, likely with Michael's influence—maybe ask Sarah) @@ -26,27 +27,33 @@ _ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) _ cut lots of words from December 2019 blogging spree _ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish _ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement) -_ somewhere: mention that "Not Man for the Categories" keeps getting cited _ revise and cut words from "bad faith" section since can link to "Assume Bad Faith" _ cut words from January 2020 Twitter exchange (after war criminal defenses) _ revise reply to Xu _ cut lots of words from Scotts comments on Jessica's MIRI post (keep: "attempting to erase the agency", Scott blaming my troubles on Michael being absurd) +_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"? +_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing -TODO blocks— -_ "Lenore" psychiatric disaster -- Eliezerfic fight conclusion +slotted TODO blocks— +✓ psychiatric disaster +_ "Agreeing With Stalin" intro recap +_ recap of crimes, cont'd +_ Dolphin War finish +_ lead-in to Sept. 2021 Twitter altercation _ Michael Vassar and the Theory of Optimal Gossip _ plan to reach out to Rick / Michael on creepy men/crazy men _ reaction to Ziz _ State of Steven _ complicity and friendship _ out of patience email -_ the hill he wants to die on -_ recap of crimes, cont'd -_ lead-in to Sept. 2021 Twitter altercation -_ Dolphin War finish -_ "Agreeing With Stalin" intro recap +- Eliezerfic fight conclusion + +blocks to fit somewhere— +_ the hill he wants to die on (insert somewhere in "Standing") +_ Tail vs. Bailey / Davis vs. Yudkowsky analogy (new block somewhere) +_ mention that "Not Man for the Categories" keeps getting cited + ------ @@ -2744,7 +2751,7 @@ I thought I should have avoided the 2022 Valinor party to avoid running into him https://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/1684947017502433281 > Keir Starmer agrees that a woman is an adult human female. Will Ed Davey also rejoin the real world, science & the English language by reversing his view that a woman can "quite clearly" have a penis? Inability to face reality in small things bodes ill for more serious matters. -Analysis of my writing mistake (show this to Jackie!!) +Analysis of my writing mistake https://twitter.com/shroomwaview/status/1681742799052341249 ------ @@ -2783,3 +2790,22 @@ https://www.datasecretslox.com/index.php/topic,1553.msg38799.html#msg38799 SK on never making a perfectly correct point https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/P3FQNvnW8Cz42QBuA/dialogue-on-appeals-to-consequences#Z8haBdrGiRQcGSXye + +Scott on puberty blockers, dreadful: https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/highlights-from-the-comments-on-fetishes + +https://jdpressman.com/2023/08/28/agi-ruin-and-the-road-to-iconoclasm.html + +https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/BahoNzY2pzSeM2Dtk/beware-of-stephen-j-gould +> there comes a point in self-deception where it becomes morally indistinguishable from lying. Consistently self-serving scientific "error", in the face of repeated correction and without informing others of the criticism, blends over into scientific fraud. + +https://time.com/collection/time100-ai/6309037/eliezer-yudkowsky/ +> "I expected to be a tiny voice shouting into the void, and people listened instead. So I doubled down on that." + +----- + +bullet notes for Tail analogy— + * My friend Tailcalled is better at science than me; in the hours that I've wasted with personal, political, and philosophical writing, he's actually been running surveys and digging into statistical methodology. + * As a result of his surveys, Tail was convinced of the two-type taxonomy, started /r/Blanchardianism, &c. + * Arguing with him resulted in my backing away from pure BBL ("Useful Approximation") + * Later, he became disillusioned with "Blanchardians" and went to war against them. I kept telling him he _is_ a "Blanchardian", insofar as he largely agrees with the main findings (about AGP as a major cause). He corresponded with Bailey and became frustrated with Bailey's ridigity. Blanchardians market themselves as disinterest truthseekers, but a lot of what they're actually doing is providing a counternarrative to social justice. + * There's an analogy between Tail's antipathy for Bailey and my antipathy for Yudkowsky: I still largely agree with "the rationalists", but the way especially Yudkowsky markets himself as a uniquely sane thinker