X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fmemoir-sections.md;h=7103af178fd0802083e009146614c27bad002f6f;hb=1bb0a20321f7ee0f3f0645d49b2b8791397d6336;hp=6cb796bdcd13423751ff8d3c91e1dd711e672627;hpb=c633b0472e14f77390b88915e122a5a05d61ad0f;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index 6cb796b..7103af1 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -1,39 +1,58 @@ first edit pass bookmark: "I got a chance to talk to" -pt. 3 edit tier (red team edition)— -— +time-sensitive globals TODOs— +✓ address red team objections to pt. 3 +✓ schedule Friendship Day at Valinor +✓ apply pro edits to pt. 3 +✓ address auto edit tier to pt. 3 +- rephrase "everyone-yelling operation" in pt. 5 +_ consult Anna +_ clear with Steven +_ finish and ship "Reply to Scott on Autogenderphilia" +_ finish and ship "Hrunkner Unnerby" +_ psychiatric disaster private doc +_ clear with Michael/Ben/Jessica +_ clear with Alicorn +_ clear with Kelsey +_ clear with Ray +_ clear with Ruby +_ SHIP PT. 3!! +------------ +_ address auto edit tier to pt. 4–5 +_ red team pt. 4–5 +_ pro edit pt. 4–5 +_ consult lc + pt. 3 edit tier (auto edition)— -✓ footnote on the bad-faith condition on "My Price for Joining" -✓ footnote explaining quibbles on clarification -✓ quote Yudkowsky's LW moderation policy -✓ hint at "Yes Requires" objector being trans -✓ quote Jack on timelines anxiety -✓ clarify "A Lesson is Learned" -- nuance and FTX epilogue -_ clarify that cheerful price history is with Anna specifically -_ briefly speculate on causes of brain damage (tie in to moderation policy?) +✓ FTX aside footnote version +✓ revert alphabet names (from 17638259f20) +✓ narcissistic delusions +✓ clarify that cheerful price history is with Anna specifically +✓ screenshot "pleading, snarky reply" +✓ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links +✓ return on cognitive investment +✓ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse" (posse) +✓ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite" ---- +_ Ruby fight included ban threat, "forces of blandness want me gone ... stand my ground" remark +_ breakup song +_ briefly speculate on causes of brain damage (tie in to moderation policy?) _ being friends with dogs (it's good, but do I have the wordcount budget?) -_ Ruby fight: "forces of blandness want me gone ... stand my ground" remark _ mention that I was miffed about "Boundaries?" not getting Curated, while one of Euk's animal posts did _ explicitly mention http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/bad-faith-behavior-not-feeling/ _ meeting with Ray (maybe?) _ mention Said rigor check somewhere, nervousness about Michael's gang being a mini-egregore _ I should respond to Ziz's charges that my criticism of concept-policing was a form of concept-policing _ Anna's claim that Scott was a target specifically because he was good, my counterclaim that payment can't be impunity -_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"? _ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing _ the "reducing negativity" post does obliquely hint at the regression point being general _ link to protest flyer -_ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse"? (editor might catch?) _ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to see an obvious analogy (editor might catch?) _ better explanation of MOPs in "Social Reality" scuffle (editor might catch?) _ better context on "scam" &c. earlier (editor might catch?) _ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (editor might catch?) _ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) (but it still seems clear to me on re-read?) -_ screenshot "pleading, snarky reply" -_ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links pt. 4 edit tier— ✓ "Ideology Is Not the Movement" mentions not misgendering @@ -83,6 +102,7 @@ _ "Not Man for the Categories" keeps getting cited _ the hill he wants to die on _ humans have honor instead of TDT. "That's right! I'm appealing to your honor!" _ Leeroy Jenkins Option +_ consult 93 about Jessica's dramapost § _ historical non-robot-cult rationality wisdom _ work in the "some clever gambit to play trans activists and gender-critical feminists against each other" _ finale: mention that I'm not doing the dumb reversed-stupidity thing @@ -97,11 +117,15 @@ _ GreaterWrong over Less Wrong for comment links things to discuss with Michael/Ben/Jessica— _ Anna on Paul Graham _ Yudkowsky thinking reasoning wasn't useful -_ Jessica brought up race & IQ (she skimmed the previous draft, so I should highlight this) -_ FTX and nuance epilogue (new) +_ Jessica brought up race & IQ (she skimmed the previous draft, so I should highlight), or calling Ruby a MOP +_ Ben publish "Discursive Warfare and Faction Formation" doc? +_ footnote about FTX +_ revision of "yelling" description _ Michael's SLAPP against REACH (new) _ Michael on creepy and crazy men (new) _ elided Sasha disaster (new) +_ what should I say to Iceman? +_ "yelling" pt. 3–5 prereaders— @@ -2813,7 +2837,6 @@ I don't, actually, expect people to spontaneously blurt out everything they beli ----- - Michael said that we didn't want to police Eliezer's behavior, but just note that something had seemingly changed and move on. "There are a lot of people who can be usefully informed about the change," Michael said. "Not him though." That was the part I couldn't understand, the part I couldn't accept.