X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fmemoir-sections.md;h=9ede28399f357d767375e3a7098d5b96512e18e5;hb=87b99b9792a15c42233e1cf7ea5ffbffb9f2de2b;hp=4d5f1dc6b4407b845919775ef4b75c0cfdf9d4a1;hpb=86c65be587ae548d27e8e5a5de7ca01d84614c9f;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index 4d5f1dc..9ede283 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -first edit pass bookmark: "seemed to accept this as an inevitable background" +first edit pass bookmark: "I received a Twitter DM from" blocks to fit somewhere— _ the hill he wants to die on (conclusion for "Zevi's Choice"??) @@ -15,41 +15,49 @@ pt. 3 edit tier— ✓ cut words from the "Yes Requires" slapfight? ✓ cut words from "Social Reality" scuffle ✓ examples of "bitter and insulting" comments about rationalists -- Scott got comas right in the same year as "Categories" ------ -_ Ben on "locally coherent coordination": use direct quotes for Ben's language—maybe rewrite in my own language (footnote?) as an understanding test -_ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray +✓ Scott got comas right in the same year as "Categories" +✓ "I" statements +✓ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky thinks of himself +✓ cut words from December 2019 blogging spree +✓ mention "Darkest Timeline" and Skyrms somewhere +✓ "Not the Incentives"—rewrite given that I'm not shielding Ray +✓ the skeptical family friend's view +✓ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish +✓ "admit that you are in fact adding a bit of autobiography to the memoir." +✓ anyone who drives at all +✓ clarify that can't remember details: "everyone else seemed to agree on things" +✓ "It's not just talking hypothetically, it is specifically calling a bluff, the point of the hypothetical" +✓ the history of civil rights +✓ it's not obvious why you can't recommend "What You Can't Say" +✓ Ben on "locally coherent coordination" don't unattributedly quote + +_ "it might matter timelessly" → there are people with AI chops who are PC (/2017/Jan/from-what-ive-tasted-of-desire/) +_ confusing people and ourselves about what the exact crime is +_ footnote explaining quibbles on clarification +_ FTX validated Ben's view of EA!! ("systematically conflating corruption, accumulation of dominance, and theft, with getting things done") +_ "your failure to model social reality is believing people when they claim noble motives" +_ hint at Vanessa being trans + +_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"? +_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing +_ link to protest flyer +_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy _ better explanation of MOPs in "Social Reality" scuffle _ better context on "scam" &c. earlier -_ meeting with Ray? _ mention that I was miffed about "Boundaries?" not getting Curated, while one of Euk's animal posts did _ establish usage of "coordination group" vs. "posse"? _ LessWrong vs. GreaterWrong for comment links? _ cut words from descriptions of other posts! (if people want to read them, they can click through ... but on review, these descriptions seem pretty reasonable?) -------- -_ cut words from NRx denouncement Jessica discussion -_ later thoughts on jump to evaluation, translating between different groups' language +_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) (but it still seems clear to me on re-read?) _ explicitly mention http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/bad-faith-behavior-not-feeling/ -_ "I" statements -_ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky _thinks of himself_ as having given up on Speech _in those words_" -_ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) -_ cut lots of words from December 2019 blogging spree -_ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish -_ choice quotes in "end of the Category War" thank you note -_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"? -_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing -_ mention "Darkest Timeline" and Skyrms somewhere -_ footnote explaining quibbles? (the first time I tried to write this, I hesitated, not sure if necessary) -_ "it was the same thing here"—most readers are not going to understand what I see as the obvious analogy -_ first mention of Jack G. should introduce him properly -_ link to protest flyer - +_ meeting with Ray (maybe?) pt. 4 edit tier— _ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement) _ revise and cut words from "bad faith" section since can link to "Assume Bad Faith" _ cut words from January 2020 Twitter exchange (after war criminal defenses) _ everyone *who matters* prefers to stay on the good side +_ if you only say good things about Republican candidates pt. 5 edit tier— _ quote specific exchange where I mentioned 10,000 words of philosophy that Scott was wrong—obviously the wrong play @@ -72,12 +80,13 @@ _ clarify that Keltham infers there are no mascochists, vs. Word of God _ "Doublethink" ref in Xu discussion should mention that Word of God Eliezerfic clarification that it's not about telling others _ https://www.greaterwrong.com/posts/vvc2MiZvWgMFaSbhx/book-review-the-bell-curve-by-charles-murray/comment/git7xaE2aHfSZyLzL + things to discuss with Michael/Ben/Jessica— _ Anna on Paul Graham -_ compression of Yudkowsky thinking reasoning wasn't useful -_ Michael's SLAPP against REACH -_ Michael on creepy and crazy men -_ elided Sasha disaster +_ Yudkowsky thinking reasoning wasn't useful +_ Michael's SLAPP against REACH (new) +_ Michael on creepy and crazy men (new) +_ elided Sasha disaster (new) pt. 3–5 prereaders— @@ -89,7 +98,7 @@ _ Steven Kaas _ David Xu _ Ray _ Ruby -_ Teortaxes? (he might be interested) +_ Alicorner #drama ("Is anyone interested in offering political advice or 'hostile advice'") ------- @@ -103,6 +112,9 @@ _ Keltham's section in dath ilan ancillary _ objections and replies in dath ilan ancillary _ kitchen knife section in dath ilan ancillary +pt. 6 edit tier— +_ coach suggests, "Arguably this doesn't count as punishment for the same reason we don't say we're "punishing" a rabid animal by euthanizing it: it's not about disincentivizing the behaviour." + dath ilan ancillary tier— _ Who are the 9 most important legislators called? _ collect Earth people sneers