X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fmemoir-sections.md;h=f27bf7518dfcbdeb89d47921dd76db4164a8b3d6;hb=e95af9bf7337257bca7fbb0c28fa1c56bf732e06;hp=774a64812df84558b53e273ffff039cef00ef98f;hpb=2b546d3b3365ef210c9d52ac6be41444733431df;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index 774a648..f27bf75 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -1,5 +1,27 @@ -Notes from pt. 3–6 readthrough (post publication of pt. 1–2)— +slotted TODO blocks— +✓ psychiatric disaster +✓ "Agreeing With Stalin" intro recap +✓ recap of crimes, cont'd +✓ Dolphin War finish +_ lead-in to Sept. 2021 Twitter altercation +_ Michael Vassar and the Theory of Optimal Gossip +_ plan to reach out to Rick / Michael on creepy men/crazy men +_ reaction to Ziz +_ State of Steven +_ complicity and friendship +_ out of patience email +- Eliezerfic fight conclusion + +blocks to fit somewhere— +_ the hill he wants to die on (insert somewhere in "Standing") +_ Tail vs. Bailey / Davis vs. Yudkowsky analogy (new block somewhere) +_ mention that "Not Man for the Categories" keeps getting cited + + + +Notes from pt. 3 readthrough— _ fullname Taylor and Hoffman at start of pt. 3 +_ footnote clarifying that "Riley" and Sarah weren't core members of the group, despite being included on some emails? _ be more specific about Ben's anti-EA and Jessica's anti-MIRI things, perhaps in footnotes _ Ben on "locally coherent coordination": use direct quotes for Ben's language—maybe rewrite in my own language (footnote?) as an understanding test _ set context for "EA Has a Lying Problem" (written by Sarah, likely with Michael's influence—maybe ask Sarah) @@ -25,29 +47,23 @@ _ we can go stronger than "I definitely don't think Yudkowsky _thinks of himself _ try to clarify Abram's categories view (Michael didn't get it) _ cut lots of words from December 2019 blogging spree _ in a footnote, defend the "cutting my dick off" rhetorical flourish +_ choice quotes in "end of the Category War" thank you note +_ do I have a better identifier than "Vassarite"? +_ maybe I do want to fill in a few more details about the Sasha disaster, conditional on what I end up writing regarding Scott's prosecution?—and conditional on my separate retro email—also the Zolpidem thing + +Notes from pt. 4 readthrough— _ mention Nick Bostrom email scandal (and his not appearing on the one-sentence CAIS statement) -_ somewhere: mention that "Not Man for the Categories" keeps getting cited _ revise and cut words from "bad faith" section since can link to "Assume Bad Faith" _ cut words from January 2020 Twitter exchange (after war criminal defenses) _ revise reply to Xu _ cut lots of words from Scotts comments on Jessica's MIRI post (keep: "attempting to erase the agency", Scott blaming my troubles on Michael being absurd) - -TODO blocks— -_ "Lenore" psychiatric disaster -- Eliezerfic fight conclusion -_ Michael Vassar and the Theory of Optimal Gossip -_ plan to reach out to Rick / Michael on creepy men/crazy men -_ reaction to Ziz -_ State of Steven -_ complicity and friendship -_ out of patience email -_ the hill he wants to die on -_ recap of crimes, cont'd -_ lead-in to Sept. 2021 Twitter altercation -_ Dolphin War finish -_ "Agreeing With Stalin" intro recap -_ Tail vs. Bailey / Davis vs. Yudkowsky analogy (somewhere) +Notes pt. 5— +_ "as Soares pointed out" needs link +_ can I rewrite to not bury the lede on "intent doesn't matter"? +_ also reference "No such thing as a tree" in Dolphin War section +_ better brief explanation of dark side epistemology +_ "deep causal structure" argument needs to be crystal clear, not sloopy ------ @@ -2797,5 +2813,9 @@ https://time.com/collection/time100-ai/6309037/eliezer-yudkowsky/ ----- - - +bullet notes for Tail analogy— + * My friend Tailcalled is better at science than me; in the hours that I've wasted with personal, political, and philosophical writing, he's actually been running surveys and digging into statistical methodology. + * As a result of his surveys, Tail was convinced of the two-type taxonomy, started /r/Blanchardianism, &c. + * Arguing with him resulted in my backing away from pure BBL ("Useful Approximation") + * Later, he became disillusioned with "Blanchardians" and went to war against them. I kept telling him he _is_ a "Blanchardian", insofar as he largely agrees with the main findings (about AGP as a major cause). He corresponded with Bailey and became frustrated with Bailey's ridigity. Blanchardians market themselves as disinterest truthseekers, but a lot of what they're actually doing is providing a counternarrative to social justice. + * There's an analogy between Tail's antipathy for Bailey and my antipathy for Yudkowsky: I still largely agree with "the rationalists", but the way especially Yudkowsky markets himself as a uniquely sane thinker