X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fmemoir-sections.md;h=f5c7cc4d437e6c6a83c4a74f3e875cb9c42679a5;hb=c1c8d40b04a72ba2b0b89841379eeebf3f32a63f;hp=ce6b38d4d95f959eda1b7ae6f6224897a536d128;hpb=a4f88e90034507fc8d1e5a794492fcca8aa396e5;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md
index ce6b38d..f5c7cc4 100644
--- a/notes/memoir-sections.md
+++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md
@@ -1,35 +1,46 @@
-- "A Hill" edit sweep (bookmark phrase: "The language I spoke was")
-
 near editing tier—
+✓ explain that "A Human's Guide to Words" / 37 Ways are the same text
 _ explain the title
+_ Caliphate / craft and the community
+_ happy price subject line in pt. 1
+_ incentives of gatekeeping and system-mandated lies
+_ conflict theory of transness!!
+_ explain Michael's gaslighting charge, using the "bowels of Christ" language
+_ "Margaret" discussion needs to cover the part where I'd cause less disruption if I transitioned
 _ so embarrassed after the Singularity
 _ mention my "trembling hand" history with secrets, not just that I don't like it
-_ NRx explanation should include the "there's only what won" line
-_ It's not clear anyone he usually respects was making this mistake; it seems likely that the original thread was subtweeting Eric Weinstein, who was not making this mistake
-_ explain that "A Human's Guide to Words" / 37 Ways are the same text
-_ Noether's theorem allusion re "... Boundaries?"
-_ smooth out "still had his email" callback
-_ Caliphate / craft and the community
+_ Eric Weinstein, who was not making this mistake
+_ scan through "People" for any more details I want to incorporate later
+_ pt. 1 end should summarize missing part a little more
+_ pt. 1 end needs to mention BABSCon (back referenced)
+_ more self-awareness about the ethical
+_ born five years too early
+
+
+"pro editor might know better how to fix this" tier—
 _ explain back in the _Overcoming Bias_ era
-_ pt.1 end needs to mention BABSCon (back referenced)
+_ smooth out "still had his email" callback
 
 
 people to consult specifically before pt. 1–3:
-_ hostile prereader? (first-choice: April) 
+sent, need approval for pt. 1-2—
+_ hostile prereader, maybe?? (first-choice: April)
 - professional editor
-
-Needed for pt. 1-2—
+✓ Tail (AGP discussion)
+✓ Anna
+✓ Ben/Jessica (Michael)
+✓ "Riley"
 - "Thomas"
-- Ben/Jessica (Michael) [pt. 2-]
-_ Tail (AGP discussion) [pt. 1]
-_ Sarah (name mention, whether to name conversation) [pt. 1-2]
-_ Sophia [pt. 1]
-_ Anna [blanket]
-_ Scott [blanket]
-_ "Bill" [pt. 2-]
-_ Alicorn: briefly, and for Melkor Glowfic reference link [pt. 2]
-_ "Noreen" [pt. 2]
-_ "Rebecca" (consent, pseudonym choice) [pt. 2, not before 15 June]
+- "Rebecca"
+- Scott
+- Sarah
+
+to send (Discord)—
+_ Alicorn
+
+to write—
+_ Sophia
+_ "Margaret"
 
 
 ----------------
@@ -156,10 +167,7 @@ _ CfAR's AI pivot??
 _ example of "steelman before criticize" norm
 _ explain mods protect-feelings
 _ explain MOPs better
-_ also had back-and-forth with "Noreen" on 8 Feb in Rob's thread!!
 _ Motta-Mena and Puts probability-of-gynephilia-by-intersex-condition graph, re trans kids on the margin
-_ "Noreen" discussion needs to cover the part where I'd cause less disruption if I transitioned
-_ "Noreen"'s girlfriend definitely needs to be mentioned
 _ get exact dates and correct Sequencing on late 2016 conversations
 _ mention Michael's influence and South Park recs in late 2016?
 _ probably give Amelia as pseudonym?
@@ -2675,3 +2683,9 @@ Like all intellectuals, as a teenager I imagined that I would write a book. It w
 
   * In the Ruby slapfight, I was explicit about "You shouldn't be making moderation decisions based on seniority"—this time, I've moved on to just making decisions based on seniority; if we're doing consequentialism based on how to attract people to the website, it's clear that there are no purer standards left to appeal to
 ]
+
+insane religious fantatics who "merely" want heretics to know their place (as opposed to wanting to hurt or exile them) are still insane religious fanatics. 
+
+A hill of validity in defense of meaning.
+
+playing a Dagny Taggart strategy: https://twitter.com/zackmdavis/status/1606718513267486721
\ No newline at end of file