X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fnotes.txt;h=c79ee0d60f78da6391ff36d884beb93b75893788;hb=46f8a69ac245dd820338c8b9bda654ec367e444b;hp=7b4f87b39a3ea8175751c5e253c1e26a564428b8;hpb=ba79d5b81bee4720799938e4eab6fa7f730c510c;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index 7b4f87b..c79ee0d 100644
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -1312,3 +1312,9 @@ who should be classified as having the Bad Man property and therefore be exclude
 
 
  thanks for the marketing advice! I should _definitely_ take that into account if I ever decide to put more effort into \"persuading people\", which sounds like something that an aspiring instrumental rationalist would care about. Perhaps unfortunately, however, I'm an aspiring epistemic rationalist: all I can do is try to communicate what I actually think and feel using clear language (and standard rhetorical techniques like sarcasm, satire, &c. that people know how to interpret even if they wouldn't be clear if someone na\u00c3\u00afvely took the words literally). If other people aren't persuaded by this ... maybe they _shouldn't_ be! Maybe I can live with that!"
+
+
+I _really, really_ don't want to participate in an oppression Olympics; I think it would be _really really bad_ to try to settle social-norms disputes with a competition to see which coalition can rack up more probabilistic suicides. (Just think about what incentives that creates!) But for the people who _are_ going to make decisions on the basis of probabilistic suicides _anyway_, surely my suffering deserves to be counted, too?
+
+True male side/true female side: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FBgozHEv7J72NCEPB/my-way#AEZaakdcqySmKMJYj
+