really should mention Freund in this sentence
authorM. Taylor Saotome-Westlake <ultimatelyuntruethought@gmail.com>
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:17:06 +0000 (15:17 -0700)
committerM. Taylor Saotome-Westlake <ultimatelyuntruethought@gmail.com>
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:17:06 +0000 (15:17 -0700)
content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md

index 308dfb7..811b8c9 100644 (file)
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Tags: history, two-type taxonomy
 
 Of course, "Blanchard's" typology is subject to [Stigler's law of eponymy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy).
 
-No, I'm not talking about earlier Western sexologists like Robert Stoller or Magnus Hirchfield.
+No, I'm not talking about earlier Western sexologists like Robert Stoller, Magnus Hirchfield, or Blanchard's mentor Kurt Freund.
 
 I'm talking about Abu Zakaria Yahya Ibn Sharaf al-NawawÄ« [writing in _the 13th century CE_](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mukhannathun&oldid=765195263#Scholarly_analysis):