check in

diff --git a/content/drafts/i-tell-myself-to-let-the-story-end.md b/content/drafts/i-tell-myself-to-let-the-story-end.md
index ad25244..ecec5a9 100644 (file)
--- a/content/drafts/i-tell-myself-to-let-the-story-end.md
+++ b/content/drafts/i-tell-myself-to-let-the-story-end.md
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-Title: "I Tell Myself to Let the Story End"
+Title: "I Tell Myself to Let the Story End"; Or, A Hill of Validity in Defense of Meaning
 Date: 2020-01-01
 Category: commentary
 Tags: personal
@@ -14,9 +14,7 @@ Status: draft
 >
 > —Sara Barellies, ["Gonna Get Over You"](https://genius.com/Sara-bareilles-gonna-get-over-you-lyrics)
 
-I really wasn't doing so well for the five-month period between December and April.
-
-Explaining this requires some context-setting.
+I mostly haven't been doing so well for the past eight months or so. I've been reluctant to write about it in too much detail for poorly-understood psychological reasons. Maybe it feels too much like attacking my friends? Maybe I'm not sure how much I can say without leaking too much information from private conversations? But I need to write _something_—not to attack anyone or spill anyone's secrets, but just to _tell the truth_ about why I've been wasting stretches of days in _constant emotional pain_ all year. For my own healing, for my own sanity.
 
 So, I've spent basically my entire adult life in this insular little intellectual subculture that was founded in the late 'aughts on an ideal of _absolute truthseeking_. Sure, anyone will _say_ that their beliefs are true, but you can tell most people aren't being very serious about it. _We_ were going to be serious: starting with the shared canon of knowledge of cognitive biases, reflectivity, and Bayesian probability theory bequeathed to us by our founder, _we_ were going to make serious [collective](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XqmjdBKa4ZaXJtNmf/raising-the-sanity-waterline) [intellectual progress](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/Nu3wa6npK4Ry66vFp/a-sense-that-more-is-possible) in a way that had [never been done before](https://slatestarcodex.com/2017/04/07/yes-we-have-noticed-the-skulls/), to forge and refine a new mental martial art of _systematically correct reasoning_ that we were going to use to optimize ourselves and the world.
 
@@ -24,7 +22,9 @@ So, I've spent basically my entire adult life in this insular little intellectua
 
 I guess I feel pretty naïve now, but—I _actually believed our own propoganda_. I _actually thought_ we were doing something new and special of historical and possibly even _cosmological_ significance.
 
-And so when I moved to "Portland" in 2016, and encountered evidence that convinced me of the homosexual/autogynephilic two-types theory of MtF transgenderism that I had previously assumed was false (while being privately grateful that [there was a _word_ for my thing](/2017/Feb/a-beacon-through-the-darkness-or-getting-it-right-the-first-time/)) because everyone _said_ it was false, that seemed like information worth signal-boosting.
+And so when I moved to "Portland" (which is actually Berkeley) in 2016, met a lot of trans women in real life for the first time, and did some more reading that convinced me of the at-least-approximate-correctness of the homosexual/autogynephilic two-types theory of MtF transgenderism that I had previously assumed was false (while being privately grateful that [there was a _word_ for my thing](/2017/Feb/a-beacon-through-the-darkness-or-getting-it-right-the-first-time/)) because everyone _said_ it was false
+
+
 
 We're all about, like, science and rationality and stuff, right? And so if there's a theory that's been sitting in the psychology literature for twenty years, that looks _correct_ (or at least, ah, less wrong than the mainstream view), that's _directly_ relevant to a _lot_ of people around here, that seems like the sort of thing 
 
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/9KvefburLia7ptEE3/the-correct-contrarian-cluster
 
 I confess that I _may have [overreacted](/2017/Mar/fresh-princess/) [somewhat](/2017/Jun/memoirs-of-my-recent-madness-part-i-the-unanswerable-words/)_ when people weren't converging (or [even engaging](/2017/Jan/im-sick-of-being-lied-to/)) with me on the two-types/autogynephilia thing. Psychology is a genuinely difficult empirical science
 
-I would _never_ write someone off for disagreeing with me about a complicated empirical thing, because complicated empirical things are complicated enough that I have to take the Outside View seriously: no matter how "obvious" I think my view is, I might still be wrong for real in real life. So, while I was pretty upset for my own idiosyncratic personal reasons, it wasn't cause to _give up entirely on the dream of a rationality community_.
+I would _never_ write someone off for disagreeing with me about a complicated empirical thing, because complicated empirical things are complicated enough that I have to [take the Outside View seriously](https://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/07/beware-the-insi.html): no matter how "obvious" I think my view is, I might still be wrong for real in real life. So, while I was pretty upset for my own idiosyncratic personal reasons, it wasn't cause to _give up entirely on the dream of a rationality community_.
 
 A.T. and R.B.'s Facebook comments
 
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ emphasize that the categories-are-relative thing is an important grain of truth,
 
 this is _really basic shit_
 
-https://www.overcomingbias.com/2007/07/beware-the-insi.html
+
 
 The way this is supposed to work is that you just make your arguments and trust that good arguments will outcompete bad ones; emailing people begging for a clarification is kind of rude and I want to acknowledge the frame in which I'm the bad guy (or pitably mentally ill)—but I was taught that arguing with people when they're doing something wrong is actually doing them a _favor_—I was taught that it's virtuous to make an extraordinary effort
 
@@ -116,3 +116,5 @@ I'll be alright. Just not tonight.
 maybe 50,000 years from now we'll all be galatic superminds and laugh about all this
 
 (probably tell the story with no external links, only this-blog links)
+
+I'll be alright. Just not tonight. But someday.

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index c79ee0d..3bc2606 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -1318,3 +1318,5 @@ I _really, really_ don't want to participate in an oppression Olympics; I think
 
 True male side/true female side: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FBgozHEv7J72NCEPB/my-way#AEZaakdcqySmKMJYj
 
+policing: "we definitely expect better models of gender out of you": https://twitter.com/atax1a/status/1157066530028265473
+

diff --git a/notes/post_ideas.txt b/notes/post_ideas.txt
index 68a3964..37a6ab6 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/post_ideas.txt
+++ b/notes/post_ideas.txt
@@ -1,21 +1,26 @@
-(Attention conservation notice: Diary-like navel-gazing. If you're here for the insight porn, come back tomorrow. If you're here for Actual Philosophy, come back next week.)
+(Attention conservation notice: Diary-like navel-gazing today and tomorrow. If you're here for the insight porn, come back Wednesday. If you're here for Actual Philosophy, come back next week.)
 
 _ Mon: "A Love That Is Out of Anyone's Control"
-_ Tue: The Social Construction of Reality and the Sheer Goddamned
+_ Tue: "I Tell Myself to Let the Story End"
+_ Wed: The Social Construction of Reality and the Sheer Goddamned
 
 
-_ Commentary on "Blegg Mode" (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/GEJzPwY8JedcNX2qz/blegg-mode)
-_ On the Argumentative Form "Super-proton Things Tend to Come in Varieties"
-
+_ Mon: Commentary on "Blegg Mode" (https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/GEJzPwY8JedcNX2qz/blegg-mode)
+_ Tue: On the Argumentative Form "Super-proton Things Tend to Come in Varieties"
 _ Terminology Gap: "Biological vs. Natal" (solution: "Developmental")
 
 
+karaoke, celebrity, cognitive load; I don't want people to do that for me
+
+Option<String>?! https://web.archive.org/web/20160731010249/https://qntm.org/gay
+
 
 _ "Lies to Cis People", a.k.a., "Lies"
 _ I Mean, Yes, I Agree That Man Should Allocate Some More Categories, But
 _ How Dumb Do You Think We Are?
 
 
+
 https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/4ZvJab25tDebB8FGE/you-have-about-five-words : well, that explains the TWAW mantra
 
 

diff --git a/notes/tweet_pad.txt b/notes/tweet_pad.txt
index 6297eaa..43175e8 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/tweet_pad.txt
+++ b/notes/tweet_pad.txt
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ Men are trash! (With respect to the definition of "trash" as "of or relating to
 
 "Bayesian reasoning" is a TERF dogwhistle
 
+Taylor Swift's "Speak Now" is an allegory about how a single dissenter's courage can shatter preference-falsification equilibria https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ6O785wx8c
+
 link to Tail: https://twitter.com/BlanchardPhD/status/1089172233300443136
 
 too emotionally exhausted: https://twitter.com/zackmdavis/status/1112408859639898113