check in

diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt
index ee3163c..6166ba8 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/notes.txt
+++ b/notes/notes.txt
@@ -2387,3 +2387,5 @@ B.F. on JKR (https://www.facebook.com/duncan.sabien/posts/3883966591638029?comme
 > I am very glad that I don't have anyone with opinions similar to hers in my immediate vicinity, because I am pretty sure that if I did, my brain would constantly be running a scared loop in any social interactions with them. [...]  I think it's important that people can write essays that are as far outside my personal Overton window as hers is outside it (because sometimes they're correct and I should update, even though I don't believe this is an instance of that)
 
 https://www.newsweek.com/we-need-balance-when-it-comes-gender-dysphoric-kids-i-would-know-opinion-1567277
+
+https://trickymothernature.substack.com/p/one-long-cum

diff --git a/notes/speech.md b/notes/speech.md
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..7461937
--- /dev/null
+++ b/notes/speech.md
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+I want to focus on the speech angle!
+
+L (Zero)—
+
+> an extremely generous perspective of who should be banned, considering that Capitol insurrection apologists of many forms are getting banned many places but Tailcalled is still a friend of the blog
+
+Um. I think you're _deeply_ misunderstanding where Tailcalled is coming from. 
+
+
+
+Emma—
+
+> r/GCdebatesQT [...] basically a hate sub dressed up as a debate sub. I can see and basically agree with the attitude of just removing the whole GC movement from the platform as a whole rather than trying to salvage some parts of it.
+
+So, I'm having trouble reconciling this with [your earlier claim that](/2021/Jan/link-unnatural-categories-are-optimized-for-deception/#isso-93)
+
+> anti-trans campaigners like to _talk_ about "debate" a lot but don't actually make much room for it. My opinion would be that actually coming in with an attitude of "entering into a debate" would have to entail at bare minimum: [...] willingness to listen with openmindedness to the other side's reasons for believing what they believe, and making equal room for the other side to voice their side of the debate.
+
+----
+
+Dan T.—
+
+I'm noticing an interesting psychological reaction in myself where I find myself having a negative reaction to your comments while simultaneously emphatically agreeing with their literal content. I think it's a tone thing?
+
+Yes,
+
+
+https://twitter.com/Docstockk/status/1357616731523608576
+
+> Have just seen truly cold, bitter, shaming thread about trans men from followers of mine. I've soft blocked everyone I could on it, and if that's you, I urge you not to refollow me again—our politics are not the same.
+
+https://time.com/collection/100-most-influential-people-2020/5888158/chase-strangio/
+https://twitter.com/chasestrangio/status/1357323996547723264