check in

diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md
index 7bddc07..39ba69c 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/memoir-sections.md
+++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md
@@ -304,10 +304,9 @@ _ Megan (that poem could easily be about some other entomologist named Megan) ..
 _ David Xu? (Is it OK to name him in his LW account?)
 _ afford various medical procedures
 _ Buck? (get the story about Michael being escorted from events)
-_ A/a alumna??
 _ Ray
 _ Ruby
-_ Kay Brown?? (assuming I include the delusional emails to her)
+_ Teortaxes??
 
 marketing—
 _ Twitter
@@ -2793,3 +2792,15 @@ Something he said made me feel spooked that he knew something about risks of fut
 https://twitter.com/zackmdavis/status/1435856644076830721
 > The error in "Not Man for the Categories" is not subtle! After the issue had been brought to your attention, I think you should have been able to condemn it: "Scott's wrong; you can't redefine concepts in order to make people happy; that's retarded." It really is that simple! 4/6
 
+> It can also be naive to assume that all the damage that people consistently do is unintentional.  For that matter, Sam by being "lol you mad" rather than "sorry" is continuing to do that damage.  I'd have bought "sorry" rather a lot better, in terms of no ulterior motives.
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1706861603029909508
+
+-------
+
+On 27 September 2023, Yudkowsky told Quentin Pope, "If I was given to your sort of attackiness, I'd now compose a giant LW post about how this blatant error demonstrates that nobody should trust you about anything else either." (https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1707142828995031415) I felt like it was an OK use of bandwidth to point out that tracking reputations is sometimes useful (https://twitter.com/zackmdavis/status/1707183146335367243). My agenda here is the same as when I wrote "... on Epistemic Conduct for Author Criticism": I don't want Big Yud using his social power to delegitimize "attacks" in general, because I have an interest in attacking him. Later, he quote-Tweeted something and said,
+
+> People need to grow up reading a lot of case studies like this in order to pick of a well-calibrated instinctive sense of what ignorant criticism typically sounds like.  A derisory tone is a very strong base cue, though not an invincible one.
+
+Was he subtweeting me?? (Because I was defending criticism against tone policing, and this is saying tone is a valid cue.) If it was a subtweet, I take that as vindication that my reply was a good use of bandwidth.
+
+-----

diff --git a/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv b/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv
index dbf1e75..6d4e3ea 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv
+++ b/notes/memoir_wordcounts.csv
@@ -525,4 +525,6 @@
 09/23/2023,117751,0\r
 09/24/2023,117751,0\r
 09/25/2023,117702,-49\r
-09/26/2023,,\r
+09/26/2023,118587,885\r
+09/27/2023,119043,456\r
+09/28/2023,,\r