draft "Political Science Epigrams"
authorM. Taylor Saotome-Westlake <ultimatelyuntruethought@gmail.com>
Sun, 8 Dec 2019 23:19:08 +0000 (15:19 -0800)
committerM. Taylor Saotome-Westlake <ultimatelyuntruethought@gmail.com>
Sun, 8 Dec 2019 23:19:08 +0000 (15:19 -0800)
content/drafts/political-science-epigrams.md [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/content/drafts/political-science-epigrams.md b/content/drafts/political-science-epigrams.md
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..387d4d0
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+Title: Political Science Epigrams
+Date: 2020-01-01 
+Category: other
+Tags: cathartic
+Status: draft
+
+If your policy is, "We don't negotiate with terrorists, but we do appease bears", then from the perspective of a third party fighting a war against the bears, you look like a productive asset being farmed by the bears, and thus, a legitimate military target.
+
+If your behavior is optimized to respond to political threats, but not to carefully-reasoned arguments from your friends, at some point your friends start to face a strong incentive to stop being your friends and start threatening you politically, because you've made it clear from your behavior that that's all you respond to.
+
+If you were angry at an enemy (who used to be a friend), you might throw a rock at them. But if they didn't react to the last rock, you need to patiently build a bigger rock.