From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 03:53:32 +0000 (-0800) Subject: silenced X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=commitdiff_plain;ds=inline;h=224da90b1a7ec33cc489e6b61b8627f8fa014faa;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git silenced --- diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index f55887a..104bdbd 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -1563,7 +1563,7 @@ I assume starting a detransition market would be not-OK ----- -FYI, I think this turned out significantly harsher on you than my January 2022 emails made it sound, thus occasioning this one additional email (because I want to be very sure I'm only attacking you and not betraying you; a true friend stabs you in the front). +FYI, I think this turned out significantly harsher on you than my January 2022 emails made it sound, thus occasioning this additional email. I'm planning on publishing the drafts linked below on [dates]. @@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ I'm planning on publishing the drafts linked below on [dates]. * "Agreeing with Stalin in Ways That Exhibit Generally Rationalist Principles" (19K words) * **"Why I Don't Trust Eliezer Yudkowsky's Intellectual Honesty"** (1.5K word summary of the parts of the Whole Dumb Story that are specifically an attack on your reputation) -I'm available if you want to contest anything you think is unfair or challenge my interpretation of the "can't directly refer to private conversations" privacy norm, but I doubt it's a high-value use of your time. End transmission. +**If you want to contest any purported factual inaccuracies or my interpretation of the "no direct references to private conversations" privacy norm, get back to me before [date].** If you have anything else to say for yourself, you can say it in the public comments section. End transmission. ---- @@ -1634,3 +1634,16 @@ https://graymirror.substack.com/p/the-journalist-rationalist-showdown https://twitter.com/jstn/status/1591088015941963776 > 2023 is going to be the most 2005 it's been in years + +------- + +re the FTX debacle, Yudkowsky retweets Katja: + +https://twitter.com/KatjaGrace/status/1590974800318861313 +> So I'd advocate for instead taking really seriously when someone seems to be saying that they think it's worth setting aside integrity etc for some greater good + +I'm tempted to leave a message in #drama asking if people are ready to generalize this to Kolmogorov complicity (people _very explicitly_ setting aside integrity &c. for the greater good of not being unpopular with progressives). It's so appropriate!! But it doesn't seem like a good use of my diplomacy budget relative to finishing the memoir—the intelligent social web is predictably going to round it off to "Zack redirecting everything into being about his hobbyhorse again, ignore". For the same reason, I was right to hold back my snarky comment about Yudkowsky's appeal to integrity in "Death With Dignity": the universal response would have been, "read the room." Commenting here would be bad along the same dimension, albeit not as extreme. + +------ + +effects on my social life—calculating what I'm allowed to say; making sure I contribute non-hobbyhorse value to offset my hobbyhorse interruptions