From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2022 15:59:41 +0000 (-0800) Subject: check in X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0563985a3263fffd2c33d966d27528a6acc78f60;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git check in --- diff --git a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md index 1cbbc2c..b8c4791 100644 --- a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md +++ b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ At this point it was almost 2 _p.m._ (the paragraphs above summarize a larger vo When I arrived at the party, people were doing a reading of [the "Hero Licensing" dialogue epilogue](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dhj9dhiwhq3DX6W8z/hero-licensing) to _Inadequate Equilibria_. Yudkowsky himself was, playing the part of the Mysterious Stranger in the dialogue. At some point, Scott and I retreated upstairs to continue our discussion. By the end of it, I was at least feeling more assured of Scott's sincerity (rather than him being coerced into not saying anything incriminating over email). Scott said he would edit in a disclaimer note at the end of "... Not Man for the Categories". -If I also got the chance to talk to Yudkowsky for a few minutes, I don't think I would be allowed to recount any details of that here due to the privacy rules I'm following in this document. +It would have been interesting if I also got the chance to talk to Yudkowsky for a few minutes, but if I did, I wouldn't be allowed to recount any details of that here due to the privacy norm I'm following in this document. The rest of the party was nice. People were reading funny GPT-2 quotes from their phones. At one point, conversation happened to zag in a way that let me show off the probability fact I had learned during Math and Wellness Month. A MIRI researcher sympathetically told me that it would be sad if I had to leave the Bay Area, which I thought was nice. There was nothing about the immediate conversational context to suggest that I might have to leave the Bay, but I guess by this point, my existence had become a context. @@ -1065,7 +1065,9 @@ On 1 June 2020, I received a Twitter DM from _New York Times_ reporter Cade Metz He never got back to me. -[TODO: three weeks later, Slate Star Codex went down] +[TODO: three weeks later, Slate Star Codex went down + my slate_starchive.py script +] ------ diff --git a/notes/i-tell-myself-notes.txt b/notes/i-tell-myself-notes.txt index 9f14598..369afce 100644 --- a/notes/i-tell-myself-notes.txt +++ b/notes/i-tell-myself-notes.txt @@ -214,12 +214,6 @@ I'll be alright, once I find the other side of AGP blogging: "Somebody has to and noone else will." -notice the symmetry where _both_ E and I want to partition the discussion with "That's a policy question" ... I just think it's unfair to partition after "words don't have intrinsic defn's" rather than 37 ways - -contract-drafting em, SSC blogroll is most of my traffic - -people who are constrained by their Overton ratio have an incentive to make this sacred-but-unimportant issue their https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/DumpStat but that's cruel to me - Second, consider [cause prioritization](https://concepts.effectivealtruism.org/concepts/prioritization-research/). If some Issues are particularly important from a utilitarian perspective, and some Issues are particularly important to Green partisans [Something to Protect](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/SGR4GxFK7KmW7ckCB/something-to-protect) diff --git a/notes/memoir-sections.md b/notes/memoir-sections.md index 104bdbd..4ab8a07 100644 --- a/notes/memoir-sections.md +++ b/notes/memoir-sections.md @@ -1,23 +1,22 @@ -waypoints— -✓ Jessica help with "Unnatural Categories" -✓ wireheading his fiction subreddit -✓ discrediting to the community -✓ people-I-usually-respect footnote -- Yudkowsky is trying to be a religious leader -- let's recap - -sections— -- existential risk interlude; social justice game theory; I could forgive him -- September 2020 Category War victory -- prelude to pronouns post - -dedicated day each?— -_ the dolphin war +battle stations— +✓ outline NYT defense/prelude to pronouns +_ flesh out prelude to pronouns I +_ flush out prelude to pronouns II +_ outlining existential stakes and social justice FDT +_ outlining Dolphin War II +_ flesh out existential stakes and social justice FDT +_ flesh out Dolphin War II + + +dedicated day?— _ Michael Vassar and the Theory of Optimal Gossip _ Sasha disaster With internet available— -_ footnote previous race-IQ baiting on "why do I keep bringing this up" +_ dolphin thread also referenced Georgia on trees, which also cited "Not Man for the Categories" +_ commit patch URL for my slate_starchive script +_ double-check on exact pre-edit wording of Brennan denunciation +_ Wentworth specifically doesn't want people's John-models to overwrite their own models _ footnote Charles Murray's caveats _ record of Yudkowsky citing TDT as part of decision to prosecute Emerson? _ university library sells borrowing privileges @@ -46,6 +45,8 @@ _ Anna's claim that Scott was a target specifically because he was good, my coun far editing tier— +_ footnote previous race-IQ baiting on "why do I keep bringing this up" +_ mention my "trembling hand" history with secrets, not just that I don't like it _ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yaCwW8nPQeJknbCgf/free-speech-and-triskaidekaphobic-calculators-a-reply-to as part of December 2019 blogging streak _ It's not clear anyone he usually respects was making this mistake; it seems likely that the original thread was subtweeting Eric Weinstein, who was not making this mistake _ "I Wish You Well" as breakup song @@ -101,6 +102,11 @@ _ edit the child transition section in a way that Kay Brown would be OK with, ha _ ask Jessica where Scott clarified his position on antipsychotics? _ I should respond to Ziz's charges that my criticism of concept-policing was a form of concept-policing _ why doesn't he apply his anti-optimism to his gender statements?! +_ notice the symmetry where _both_ E and I want to partition the discussion with "That's a policy question" ... I just think it's unfair to partition after "words don't have intrinsic defn's" rather than 37 ways +_ contract-drafting em, SSC blogroll is most of my traffic +_ "Common Interest of Many Causes" and "Kolmogorov Complicity" offer directly contradictory strategies +_ Vassar's about-face on gender + terms to explain on first mention— @@ -249,7 +255,7 @@ Incidental or not, the conflict is real, and everyone smart knows it—even if i Becuase of the conflict, and because all the prominent high-status people are running a Kolmogorov Option strategy, and because we happen to have to a _wildly_ disproportionate number of _people like me_ around, I think being "pro-trans" ended up being part of the community's "shield" against external political pressure, of the sort that perked up after [the February 2021 _New York Times_ hit piece about Alexander's blog](https://archive.is/0Ghdl). (The _magnitude_ of heat brought on by the recent _Times_ piece and its aftermath was new, but the underlying dynamics had been present for years.) -Jacob Falkovich notes, ["The two demographics most over-represented in the SlateStarCodex readership according to the surveys are transgender people and Ph.D. holders."](https://twitter.com/yashkaf/status/1275524303430262790) [Aaronson notes (in commentary on the _Times_ article)](https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=5310) "the rationalist community's legendary openness to alternative gender identities and sexualities" as something that would have "complicated the picture" of our portrayal as anti-feminist. +Jacob Falkovich noted (on 23 June 2020, just after _Slate Star Codex_ went down), ["The two demographics most over-represented in the SlateStarCodex readership according to the surveys are transgender people and Ph.D. holders."](https://twitter.com/yashkaf/status/1275524303430262790) [Scott Aaronson noted (in commentary on the _Times_ article)](https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=5310) "the rationalist community's legendary openness to alternative gender identities and sexualities" as something that would have "complicated the picture" of our portrayal as anti-feminist. Even the _haters_ grudgingly give Alexander credit for "... Not Man for the Categories": ["I strongly disagree that one good article about accepting transness means you get to walk away from writing that is somewhat white supremacist and quite fascist without at least awknowledging you were wrong."](https://archive.is/SlJo1) @@ -749,6 +755,7 @@ the Extropians post _explicitly_ says "may be a common sexual fantasy" https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/wustx45CPL5rZenuo/no-safe-defense-not-even-science > I'm not sure that human beings realistically _can_ trust and think at the same time. +https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/t6Fe2PsEwb3HhcBEr/the-litany-against-gurus If you listen to the sorts of things the guy says lately, it looks like he's just completely given up on the idea that public speech could possibly be useful, or that anyone besides he and his flunkies is capable of thought. For example: @@ -1647,3 +1654,8 @@ I'm tempted to leave a message in #drama asking if people are ready to generaliz ------ effects on my social life—calculating what I'm allowed to say; making sure I contribute non-hobbyhorse value to offset my hobbyhorse interruptions + +---- + +https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/FKJ8yiF3KjFhAuivt/impco-don-t-injure-yourself-by-returning-ftxff-money-for +when that happens, in EA, I often do suspect that nobody else will dare to speak the contrary viewpoint, if not me.