From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 16:26:38 +0000 (-0700) Subject: check in X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=commitdiff_plain;h=210bca9d46cd96b83ffb1edf84f408083308dfe7;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git check in --- diff --git a/content/drafts/book-review-human-diversity.md b/content/drafts/book-review-human-diversity.md index cdedd33..519f34f 100644 --- a/content/drafts/book-review-human-diversity.md +++ b/content/drafts/book-review-human-diversity.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Title: Book Review: Charles Murray's Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class Date: 2020-01-01 Category: commentary -Tags: Charles Murray, review (book), intelligence, race, sex differences, Emacs, politics, probability, topology +Tags: Charles Murray, review (book), intelligence, race, sex differences, Emacs, politics, probability, topology, COVID-19 Status: draft [This is a pretty good book](https://www.twelvebooks.com/titles/charles-murray/human-diversity/9781538744000/) about things we know about some ways in which people are different from each other! In [my last book review](/2020/Jan/book-review-the-origins-of-unfairness/), I mentioned that I had been thinking about broadening the topic scope of this blog, and this book review seems like an okay place to start! @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ Why _is_ the blank slate doctrine so compelling, that so many feel the need to p If the blank slate doctrine isn't _scientifically_ compelling—it's not something you would invent while trying to build shared maps that reflect the territory—then its appeal must have something to do with some function it plays in _conflicts_ over the shared map, where no one trusts each other to be doing Actual Social Science rather than lying to fuck everyone else over. -And that's where the blank slate doctrine absolutely _shines_—it's the [Schelling point](/2019/Oct/self-identity-is-a-schelling-point/) for preventing group conflicts! (A [_Schelling point_](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yJfBzcDL9fBHJfZ6P/nash-equilibria-and-schelling-points) is a choice that's salient as [a focus for mutual expectations](/2019/Dec/more-schelling/): what I think that you think that I think ... _&c._ we'll choose.) If you admit that there could differences between groups, you open up the questions of in what exact traits and of what exact magnitude, which people have an incentive to lie about to divert resources and power to their group by [establishing unfair conventions and then misrepresenting those contingent bargaining equilibria](/2020/Jan/book-review-the-origins-of-unfairness/) as some "inevitable" natural order. +And that's where the blank slate doctrine absolutely _shines_—it's the [Schelling point](/2019/Oct/self-identity-is-a-schelling-point/#schelling-point) for preventing group conflicts! (A [_Schelling point_](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yJfBzcDL9fBHJfZ6P/nash-equilibria-and-schelling-points) is a choice that's salient as [a focus for mutual expectations](/2019/Dec/more-schelling/): what I think that you think that I think ... _&c._ we'll choose.) If you admit that there could differences between groups, you open up the questions of in what exact traits and of what exact magnitude, which people have an incentive to lie about to divert resources and power to their group by [establishing unfair conventions and then misrepresenting those contingent bargaining equilibria](/2020/Jan/book-review-the-origins-of-unfairness/) as some "inevitable" natural order. If you're afraid of purported answers being used as a pretext for oppression, you might hope to _make the question un-askable_. Can't oppress people on the basis of race if race _doesn't exist_! Denying the existence of sex is harder—which doesn't stop people from occasionally trying. But the taboo mostly only applies to _psychological_ trait differences, because those are more [politically sensitive](http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/judgment-punishment-and-the-information-suppression-field/)—and easier to motivatedly _see what you want to see_: whereas things like height or skin tone can be directly seen and uncontroversially measured with well-understood physical instruments (like a meterstick or digital photo pixel values), psychological assessments are _much_ more complicated and therefore hard to detach from the eye of the beholder. (If I describe Mary as "warm, compassionate, and agreeable", the words mean _something_ in the sense that they change what experiences you anticipate—if you believed my report, you would be _surprised_ if Mary were to kick your dog and make fun of your nose job—but the things that they mean are a high-level statistical signal in behavior for which we [don't have a simple measurement device](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/edEXi4SpkXfvaX42j/schelling-categories-and-simple-membership-tests) like a meterstick to appeal to if you and I don't trust each other's character assessments of Mary.) @@ -182,10 +182,14 @@ The other place where I think Murray is hiding the ball (even from himself) is i I take strong issue with Murray's specific examples here—as an [incredibly bitter](http://zackmdavis.net/blog/2012/12/a-philosophy-of-education/) autodidact, I care not at all for formal school degrees, and as my fellow nobody pseudonymous blogger [Harold Lee points out](https://write.as/harold-lee/seizing-the-means-of-home-production), the domestic- and community-focused life of a housewife actually has a lot of desirable properties that many of those stuck in the technology rat race aspire to escape into. But after quibbling with the specific illustrations, I think I'm just going to bite the bullet here? -_Yes_, intellectual ability _is_ a component of human worth, and that's putting it baldly, but I think the _alternative_ is obviously senseless. The fact that I have the ability and motivation to (for example, among many other things I do) write this cool science-philosophy blog about my delusional paraphilia where I do things like summarize and critique the new Charles Murray book, is a big part of _what makes my life valuable_—both to me, and to the people who interact with me. If I were to catch COVID-19 next month and lose 40 IQ points due to oxygen-deprivation-related brain damage and not be able to write long sentences like this anymore, that would be an _extremely terrible thing_. +_Yes_, intellectual ability _is_ a component of human worth! That's putting it baldly, but I think the _alternative_ is obviously senseless. The fact that I have the ability and motivation to (for example, among many other things I do) write this cool science–philosophy blog about my delusional paraphilia where I do things like summarize and critique the new Charles Murray book, is a big part of _what makes my life valuable_—both to me, and to the people who interact with me. If I were to catch COVID-19 next month and lose 40 IQ points due to oxygen-deprivation-induced brain damage and not be able to write blog posts like this one anymore, that would be _extremely terrible for me_. + I mean, maybe it depends on what you mean by "worth"? > The conflation of intellectual ability with human worth helps to explain the new upper class's insistence that inequalities of intellectual ability must be the product of environmental disadvantage. Many people with high IQs really do feel sorry for people with low IQs. If the environment is to blame, then those unfortunates can be helped, and that makes people who want to help them feel good. If genes are to blame, it makes people who want to help them feel bad. People prefer feeling good to feeling bad, so they engage in confirmation bias when it comes to the evidence about the causes of human differences. + + +Each of us in her own way. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/content/drafts/peering-through-reverent-fingers.md b/content/drafts/peering-through-reverent-fingers.md index 32787c7..51dbede 100644 --- a/content/drafts/peering-through-reverent-fingers.md +++ b/content/drafts/peering-through-reverent-fingers.md @@ -8,11 +8,8 @@ As an atheist, I'm not really a fan of religions, but I'll give them one thing: The progressive _Zeitgeist_ does not even offer this respite. Getting over psychological-sex-differences denialism was painful, but after many years of study and meditation, I think I've finally come to accept the horrible truth: women and men really are psychologically different, and for biologically- and not merely culturally-mediated reasons. This sets me apart from the community, but not very much. -The original lie wasn't _invisible_ exactly, but it never caused too many problems, because it's easy to doublethink around: most of the functional use of sex categories in Society is handled by seamless subconscious reference-classing, without anyone needing to consciously, verbally reason about sex differences. +The original lie wasn't _invisible_ exactly, but it never caused too many problems, because it's easy to doublethink around: most of the functional use of sex categories in Society is handled by seamless subconscious reference-classing, without anyone needing to consciously, verbally reason about sex differences. Women and men don't actually behave the same and we don't actually treat them the same, but -Give people photographs of - -[height base rates] But in the ten years I had my back turned reading science books, my former quasi-religion somehow came up with _new_ lies: now, it's not enough to believe that women and men are mentally the same, you're also supposed to accept that those words refer to diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt index 59e52c9..9e5d5e7 100644 --- a/notes/notes.txt +++ b/notes/notes.txt @@ -1764,3 +1764,7 @@ give sex denialists an inch, and they'll redefine the inch to be a mile "I had never settled on a form": https://i.redd.it/ygbkj3ock6x31.jpg General factor of ETLE? +https://dsh.fyi/posts/2020-04-14-im-trans-call-me-daisy/ + +"gender modality" https://www.florenceashley.com/academic-publications.html + diff --git a/notes/post_ideas.txt b/notes/post_ideas.txt index 774f5ce..75ac794 100644 --- a/notes/post_ideas.txt +++ b/notes/post_ideas.txt @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@ _ "I Tell Myself to Let the Story End"; Or, A Hill of Validity ... (UUT) LW/aAL— _ Algorithmic Intent: A Hansonian Generalized Anti-Zombie Principle (LW) _ Zoom vs. EMH (LW) +_ Comment on "Endogenous Epistemic Factionalization" _ Intrumental Categories, Wireheading, and War (LW) +_ Don't "Click Here" _ Contra Scott Alexander on Mental Illness; Or, Oh God, Please Don't (aAL/LW) _ Butting Heads; Or, Selective Reporting and the Tragedy of Cause Prioritization—marginally neglected truths are more _ Selective Reporting and Clustering diff --git a/notes/tech_tasks.txt b/notes/tech_tasks.txt index e172a73..982c503 100644 --- a/notes/tech_tasks.txt +++ b/notes/tech_tasks.txt @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -master Isso and Recent comments rework footnotes plugin!? (Markdown footnote format is better than [ref][/ref] tags) store Reddit icon in theme directory self-host a copy of Source Sans Pro (I'm annoyed that my devserver preview fonts are ugly when I've killed my network connection so I can focus for once)