From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:15:23 +0000 (-0800) Subject: check in X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=commitdiff_plain;h=7e4ba93774931457e78c917dd5a50f71aed51557;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git check in --- diff --git a/content/drafts/dolezal.md b/content/drafts/dolezal.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d89bb6a --- /dev/null +++ b/content/drafts/dolezal.md @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +Title: Dolezal (working title) +Date: 2022-06-01 +Category: other +Tags: race +Status: draft + +S: Didn't Rachel Dolezal get identified as black by most people? +K: yeah, I think she was fine / and everyone should have chilled the fuck out +S: Do you think she should get affirmative action and whatever other benefits we give black people? +K: honestly, yes / if she is socially perceived as black, she gets most of the detriments +S: I guess that is a...pretty good way to make our culture less crazy around race, honestly, and I respect your consistency. I think 99% of people who support transgender rights don't agree with it, but maybe they're wrong. +K: and we do still count people as black if they don't have that generational history or lack of resources +if their skin is black +Z: But we don't +K: okay, but they do say that Ethiopian immigrants from wealthy families with no generational deprivation are black diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md index 65c41ec..a68dafd 100644 --- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md +++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md @@ -475,3 +475,6 @@ And the thing where David Xu interprets criticism of Eliezer as me going "full p https://twitter.com/esyudkowsky/status/1374161729073020937 > Also: Having some things you say "no comment" to, is not at *all* the same phenomenon as being an organization that issues Pronouncements. There are a *lot* of good reasons to have "no comments" about things. Anybody who tells you otherwise has no life experience, or is lying. + +"Speak out in order to make it clear how not alt-right you are; nothing wrong with that because I'm not lying" is being inconsistent about whether signaling and mood-affiliation matters—it's trying to socially profit by signaling pro-Stalin-ness, while simultaneously denying that anyone could object (because you didn't lie—pivoting to a worldview where only literal meanings matter and signals aren't real). Can I sketch this out mathematically? + diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt index c81c985..a288f5d 100644 --- a/notes/notes.txt +++ b/notes/notes.txt @@ -2948,3 +2948,5 @@ But it's not. On this website, [Rafael Harth explains why 50% isn't special](htt I don't particularly fault Scott for this: [by his own admission, he's not a math guy](https://slatestarcodex.com/2015/01/31/the-parable-of-the-talents/). (And the vast majority of math people can't write as well or as fast as Scott. No one is the best at everything!) Rather, I'm saying that a culture that wants to _actually_ be right about everything would do better to _just_ focus on being right on the object level, without [wireheading on its own promises of being right about everything](http://benjaminrosshoffman.com/effective-altruism-is-self-recommending/). (Incidentally, Scott himself is actually very good about [not trying to claim more authority than is actually justified by his performance](https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/07/04/some-clarifications-on-rationalist-blogging/). His fans should try to be more like him along this dimension!) + +https://fairplayforwomen.com/transgender-prisoners/ diff --git a/notes/post_ideas.txt b/notes/post_ideas.txt index da4437c..c02de54 100644 --- a/notes/post_ideas.txt +++ b/notes/post_ideas.txt @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ _ Elision _vs_. Choice _ Karnofsky's presentism _ motivation for positing meta-attraction _ HPMoR on the function of democracy vs. Yarvin's true election +_ Dolezal (working title) _ Blanchard's Dangerous Idea and the Plight of the Lucid Crossdreamer