From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2022 22:34:56 +0000 (-0700) Subject: poke (we're alive on Saturday) X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=commitdiff_plain;h=c676dcaaa21627961569a70c8b0940cb147ac623;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git poke (we're alive on Saturday) --- diff --git a/content/drafts/the-two-type-taxonomy-is-a-useful-approximation-for-a-more-detailed-causal-model.md b/content/drafts/the-two-type-taxonomy-is-a-useful-approximation-for-a-more-detailed-causal-model.md index 13fd243..519f366 100644 --- a/content/drafts/the-two-type-taxonomy-is-a-useful-approximation-for-a-more-detailed-causal-model.md +++ b/content/drafts/the-two-type-taxonomy-is-a-useful-approximation-for-a-more-detailed-causal-model.md @@ -6,21 +6,26 @@ Status: draft A lot of people tend to balk when first hearing about the [two-type taxonomy of male-to-female transsexualism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blanchard's_transsexualism_typology). What, one scoffs, you're saying _all_ trans women are exactly one of these two things? It seems at once both too simple and too specific. -In some ways, it's a fair complaint! Psychology is _complicated_; every human is their own unique snowflake. But it would be impossible to navigate the world using the "every human is their own unique _maximum-entropy_ snowflake" theory. +In some ways, it's a fair complaint! Psychology is _complicated_; every human is their own unique snowflake. But it would be impossible to navigate the world using the "every human is their own unique _maximum-entropy_ snowflake" theory. In order to [compress our observations](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mB95aqTSJLNR9YyjH/message-length) of the world we see, we end up distilling our observations into categories, clusters, diagnoses, taxons: no one matches any particular clinical-profile stereotype _exactly_, but [the world makes more sense when you have language for theoretical abstractions](https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/ontology-of-psychiatric-conditions) like ["comas"](https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/11/does-the-glasgow-coma-scale-exist-do-comas/) or "depression" or "bipolar disorder"—or "autogynephilia". -categories, clusters, diagnoses, taxons +Concepts and theories are good to the extent that they can "pay for" their complexity by making more accurate predictions. -No one matches any particular clinical-profile stereotype _exactly_, but [the world makes more sense when you have language for theoretical abstractions](https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/ontology-of-psychiatric-conditions) like ["comas"](https://slatestarcodex.com/2014/08/11/does-the-glasgow-coma-scale-exist-do-comas/) or "depression" or "bipolar disorder"—or "autogynephilia". + + + + +https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_graph + ![transition causal graph](/images/transition_dag.svg) Let me explain. -https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Causal_graph -[people tend to balk at the two-type taxonomy: are you really saying there are two and only two types?!] + + [the taxonomy can emerge as a shorthand for a complicated causal graph]