From: M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 04:03:46 +0000 (-0800) Subject: check in X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ca10d1c00a08c587ef075ed1e55d16851c499776;p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git check in --- diff --git a/content/drafts/challenges-to-yudkowskys-pronoun-reform-proposal.md b/content/drafts/challenges-to-yudkowskys-pronoun-reform-proposal.md index 60eb67d..c28d523 100644 --- a/content/drafts/challenges-to-yudkowskys-pronoun-reform-proposal.md +++ b/content/drafts/challenges-to-yudkowskys-pronoun-reform-proposal.md @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ Sure. Yes. And indeed, I don't misgender people! (In public. Only rarely in priv As I have explained at length, this _rationale_ doesn't work and isn't true (even if better rationales, like the Schelling point argument, can end up recommending the same behavior). _No one_ actually believes (as contrasted to [believing that they believe](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/CqyJzDZWvGhhFJ7dY/belief-in-belief)) that _she_ and _he_ aren't attached to gender in people's heads, despite Yudkowsky's sneering claim in the comments that he ["would not know how to write a different viewpoint as a sympathetic character."](https://www.facebook.com/yudkowsky/posts/10159421750419228?comment_id=10159421986539228&reply_comment_id=10159423713134228) -Again, without attributing to Yudkowsky any _conscious, deliberative_ intent to deceive (because of the human tendency to unconsciously introduce distortions in the heat of a rapid argument), the _pants-on-fire audacity_ of this _ludicrous_ claim to ignorance just beggars belief. As the author of [one of the world's most popular _Harry Potter_ fanfictions](http://www.hpmor.com/), Yudkowsky clearly knows something about about how to simulate alternative perspectives (includes ones he disagrees with) and portray them sympathetically. And he claims not to be able to do this for ... the idea that pronouns imply sex, and that using the pronouns that imply someone is the sex that they are not feels analogous to lying? Really?! +Again, without attributing to Yudkowsky any _conscious, deliberative_ intent to deceive (because of the human tendency to unconsciously introduce distortions in the heat of a rapid argument), the _pants-on-fire audacity_ of this _ludicrous_ claim to ignorance still beggars belief. As the author of [one of the world's most popular _Harry Potter_ fanfictions](http://www.hpmor.com/), Yudkowsky clearly knows something about about how to simulate alternative perspectives (includes ones he disagrees with) and portray them sympathetically. And he claims to be _unable_ to do this for ... the idea that pronouns imply sex, and that using the pronouns that imply someone is the sex that they are not feels analogous to lying? Really?! Well, I'm not a world-acclaimed fiction author with thousands of fans, but if Yudkowsky claims not to be up to this writing challenge, I'm happy to give him a hand and show him how it might be done— @@ -209,19 +209,23 @@ Well, I'm not a world-acclaimed fiction author with thousands of fans, but if Yu > > The judge scoffs. "You are _ontologically_ confused," he sneers. "At age 13 I was programming on LambdaMOO where people had their choice of exotic pronouns and nobody thought anything of it," says the judge. "Denied." > -> "O-okay," says the victim. She doesn't know what _ontologically_ means, or what a LambdaMOO is. "So then—then sh-she took her erect penis and she—" The witness breaks down crying again. "Your Honor, I can't! I can't do it! It's not true! I mean—" She senses that the judge will imply she's stupid for saying it's not true. She gropes for some way of explaining. "I mean—the Court allows people to testify in Spanish or Chinese with the help of a translator, right? Can't you treat my testimony like that? Let me say what happened to me in the words that seems true to me, even if the court does its business using words in a different way?" +> "O-okay," says the victim. She doesn't know what _ontologically_ means, or what a LambdaMOO is. "So then—then sh-she took her erect penis and she—" The witness breaks down crying again. "Your Honor, I can't! I can't do it! It's not true! It's not—" She senses that the judge will imply she's stupid for saying it's not true. She gropes for some way of explaining. "I mean—the Court allows people to testify in Spanish or Chinese with the help of a translator, right? Can't you treat my testimony like that? Let me say what happened to me in the words that seems true to me, even if the court does its business using words in a different way?" > > "You're in contempt," says the judge. "Baliff! Take her away!" Not a sympathetic character? Not even a little bit? -I suspect some readers will have an intuition that my choice of scenario is unfair or unrealistic. +I suspect some readers will have an intuition that my choice of scenario is loaded, unfair or unrealistic. But what, specifically, is unrealistic about it? Is it the idea that a trans woman could have raped someone before transitioning? [TODO: /o/ThisNeverHappens] + + + + ----- diff --git a/notes/notes.txt b/notes/notes.txt index c2860a6..22775f5 100644 --- a/notes/notes.txt +++ b/notes/notes.txt @@ -2911,3 +2911,17 @@ gender ID ideology is like Scientology: eventually, it gets marginalized because sex-realist criminology https://jophoenix.substack.com/p/what-do-we-stand-for + +This is how I feel about the "rationalists"— +> One way that truth dies is that when we place such exacting preconditions on its delivery into our lives that there is virtually no messenger or message that can penetrate our hearts. +https://frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/the-places-where-truth-goes-to-die + +----- + +There's a glowfic thread where Thellim is _horrified_ at how shallow and superficial Jane Austen characters are, in contrast to what a human being _should_ be: "Real people have concepts of their own minds, and contemplate their prior ideas of themselves in relation to a continually observed flow of their actual thoughts, and try to improve both their self-models and their selves." + +This horror is basically how I feel about trans culture. It actively discourages self-modeling! (People who have cross-sex fantasies are encouraged to reify them into an gender identity which everyone else is supposed to unquestioningly accept. Politically-unfavorable critical questions about what's actually going on etiologically, what it means for an identity to be true, _&c._ are strongly discouraged as hateful, hurtful, distressing, _&c._) + +https://www.glowfic.com/posts/4508?page=20 + +----- diff --git a/notes/post_ideas.txt b/notes/post_ideas.txt index 3f02fc5..c8485d3 100644 --- a/notes/post_ideas.txt +++ b/notes/post_ideas.txt @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ _ "Never Smile" linkpost _ Student Dysphoria, and a Previous Life's War _ Happy Meal +_ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WikzbCsFjpLTRQmXn/declustering-reclustering-and-filling-in-thingspace _ Reply to Scott Alexander on Autogenderphilia _ Subspatial Distribution Overlap and Cancellable Stereotypes _ "But I'm Not Quite Sure What That Means": Costs of Nonbinary Gender as a Social Technology