From 53da359411b3b0988877af28952aeca94ca84177 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:17:06 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] really should mention Freund in this sentence --- content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md b/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md index 308dfb7..811b8c9 100644 --- a/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md +++ b/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Tags: history, two-type taxonomy Of course, "Blanchard's" typology is subject to [Stigler's law of eponymy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy). -No, I'm not talking about earlier Western sexologists like Robert Stoller or Magnus Hirchfield. +No, I'm not talking about earlier Western sexologists like Robert Stoller, Magnus Hirchfield, or Blanchard's mentor Kurt Freund. I'm talking about Abu Zakaria Yahya Ibn Sharaf al-Nawawī [writing in _the 13th century CE_](https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mukhannathun&oldid=765195263#Scholarly_analysis): -- 2.17.1