From 6ce3875f0bfead0795c4750f377b8ab2653e8550 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" <ultimatelyuntruethought@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 08:35:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] check in before redemption I somehow lost track of time yesterday?! It was awful! I must not be complacent today. I am on-mission today! --- notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md index 6919ceb..1e966db 100644 --- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md +++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ With internet availableâ +_ me remarking to "Wilhelm" that I think I met Vanessa at Solstice once, commented on Greg Egan _ debate with Benquo and Jessicata _ Prudentbot § from "Robust Cooperation" paper _ compile Categories references from the Dolphin War Twitter thread @@ -1484,3 +1485,7 @@ If someone says to me, "You're right, but I can't admit this in public because i But we can't even have that, because saying "You're right, but I can't admit this in public" requires _trust_. _socially load-bearing_ philosophy mistake. + +I currently write "trans woman", two words, as a strategic concession to the shibboleth-detectors of my target audience:[^two-words] I don't want to to _prematurely_ scare off progressive-socialized readers on account of mere orthography, when what I actually have to say is already disturbing enough.) + +[^two-words]: For the unfamiliar: the [doctrine here](https://medium.com/@cassiebrighter/please-write-trans-women-as-two-words-487f153444fb) is that "transwoman" is cissexist, because "trans" is properly an adjective indicating a type of woman. -- 2.17.1