From d23f1f0afc2576d2c190ebe6614a738d3ffa92c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2017 11:09:05 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] subject to --- content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md b/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md index c192fe1..308dfb7 100644 --- a/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md +++ b/content/2017/nothing-new-under-the-sun.md @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Date: 2017-03-24 18:00 Category: other Tags: history, two-type taxonomy -Of course, "Blanchard's" typology is an instance of [Stigler's law of eponymy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy). +Of course, "Blanchard's" typology is subject to [Stigler's law of eponymy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stigler%27s_law_of_eponymy). No, I'm not talking about earlier Western sexologists like Robert Stoller or Magnus Hirchfield. -- 2.17.1