From eefd480495440710b2dc1aedc88965337782d2f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "M. Taylor Saotome-Westlake" Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 09:48:22 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] More italics? Really? Really? --- content/2017/smart.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/2017/smart.md b/content/2017/smart.md index ea2f592..20fd207 100644 --- a/content/2017/smart.md +++ b/content/2017/smart.md @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@ Tags: autogynephilia, cathartic "I know. I prefer not to _phrase_ it that way, either, because like you—like everybody who matters—I think males with late-onset gender dysphoria _should_ have a respected place in Society to pursue their dream if that's what makes them happy. -"But if you ignore the derogatory _style_ of that way of _phrasing_ it and just ask about the predictions made by the mental model that generated the derogatory phrasing, _men who think they're women are delusional perverts_ is the _correct theory_! If _really smart_ people who are _really good_ at philosophy can't get this _really easy_ question right because saying the right answer out loud in clear language makes us look bad—what are we good for? Why should people who aren't _already_ ideologically allied with us _care_?" +"But if you ignore the derogatory _style_ of that way of _phrasing_ it and just ask about the [_predictions_](http://lesswrong.com/lw/i3/making_beliefs_pay_rent_in_anticipated_experiences/) made by the mental model that generated the derogatory phrasing, _men who think they're women are delusional perverts_ is the _correct theory_! If _really smart_ people who are _really good_ at philosophy can't get this _really easy_ question right because saying the right answer out loud in clear language _makes us look bad_—what are we good for? Why should people who aren't _already_ ideologically allied with us _care_?" -- 2.17.1