check in

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / content / drafts / a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md

diff --git a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
index 9a92d5e..8f745f0 100644 (file)
--- a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
+++ b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
@@ -326,3 +326,10 @@ typographic attack: https://openai.com/blog/multimodal-neurons/
 https://distill.pub/2021/multimodal-neurons/
 > These neurons detect gender^10
 > Footnote: By this, we mean both that it responds to people presenting as this gender, as well as that it responds to concepts associated with that gender.
+
+https://www.jefftk.com/p/an-update-on-gendered-pronouns
+
+> Still think this was a perfectly fine tweet btw.  Some people afaict were doing the literal ontologically confused thing; seemed like a simple thing to make progress on.  Some people wanted to read it as a coded statement despite all my attempts to narrow it, but what can you do.
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1356535300986523648
+
+If you were actually HONESTLY tring to narrow it, you would have said, "By the way, this is just about pronouns, I'm not taking a position on whether trans women are women"