complete draft (and retitle) "Comment on a Scene"

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / consilent_cultural_worldbuilding-notes.md

diff --git a/notes/consilent_cultural_worldbuilding-notes.md b/notes/consilent_cultural_worldbuilding-notes.md
index e2dc5e8..f0b6230 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/consilent_cultural_worldbuilding-notes.md
+++ b/notes/consilent_cultural_worldbuilding-notes.md
@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ Anyway, the occasion for messaging you today is that you might be a good test au
 
 I'm arguing that you being drafted into the army actually _would_ be worse (for you, and for the army) from our englighted Bayesian transhumanist perspective than it would be for a male who was otherwise personality-matched and strength-matched—for real, and not just as edgy right-wing anti-virtue signaling
 
-
-
 but you might know reasons my guess is wrong
 
 (I really appreciate the pushback earlier)
+
+I wrote a 4000-word post about how the "just test combat ability; you don't have to go by the presence of penises" conversation broke my suspension of disbelief in the cultural worldbuilding: [URL here] (Briefly: "the government isn't allowed to notice race or sex" is Earth-craziness that only makes sense as a reaction to other Earth-craziness—specifically, refusing to admit group differences into decision calculations is a Schelling point for preventing group conflicts when you don't trust people not to lie about the specific differences in a way that advantages their group. It's not something you would spontaneously invent or think was a good idea if you _actually_ grew up in a world with 140 average IQ that trained everyone in probability theory as normative reasoning.)