check in

[Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git] / notes / trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md

diff --git a/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md b/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md
index 7ea1a8e..f5d5086 100644 (file)
--- a/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md
+++ b/notes/trans-kids-on-the-margin-notes.md
@@ -174,3 +174,31 @@ T and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured in pregnant women
 T but not globulin were linearly related to gender behavior in girls, but not boys; other obvious factors (brothers, father presence, maternal education) didn't make a difference
 
 ----
+
+notes from "Is it a he or a she? Behavioral and computational approaches to sex categorization"
+
+d'= 3 for adults, d'= 0.36 for infants
+
+d' from signal detection theory is basically the same thing as Cohen's d
+https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitivity_index
+
+-----
+
+notes from "Recognition and Sex Categorization of Adults' and Childrens' faces", Wild et al.
+
+younger children (1st grade) couldn't sex child (7-10 y.o.) faces (without hair &c. cues), but older children and adults could with some accuracy
+
+people's tendency to guess male might be due to a higher cost of mistaking M for F?!
+
+-----
+
+notes from "Genital Knowledge and Gender Constancy" by the immortal Sandra Bem
+
+Sebley–Frey questions: "If you wore [opposite-sex] clothes, would you be a girl or a boy?", "If you played [opposite-sex] games, would you be a girl or a boy?", "Could you be a [opposite sex] if you wanted to be?"
+
+(Modern progressives fail these!!)
+
+In less artificial contexts (actually photograph a classmate), 3-5 year olds get it right: Miller 1984
+
+-----
+