X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=content%2F2017%2Fa-beacon-through-the-darkness-or-getting-it-right-the-first-time.md;h=894c60a7b30b6d205847b53a858b5c166d6ad76a;hp=fdb43ee688481c4b0c328b38cc9cc2bf68c51e75;hb=fd8ab6f1c85b4ee20fd68f445f07cd674c11d400;hpb=87389b532d0167f038526ec65d2bf8bd3582ab2b

diff --git a/content/2017/a-beacon-through-the-darkness-or-getting-it-right-the-first-time.md b/content/2017/a-beacon-through-the-darkness-or-getting-it-right-the-first-time.md
index fdb43ee..894c60a 100644
--- a/content/2017/a-beacon-through-the-darkness-or-getting-it-right-the-first-time.md
+++ b/content/2017/a-beacon-through-the-darkness-or-getting-it-right-the-first-time.md
@@ -11,15 +11,15 @@ I wrote in my notebook:
 
 > THERE'S A WORD FOR IT. _There's a word for it._ I don't know whether to be happy that there's an adjective for what I have, or sad that other men have it, & that it's not mine, & only mine. Bless Wikipedia for showing me [...] But still, after all emotions have fitted themselves away, there is the word. "Autogynephilia." So simple; I know all the foreign roots; I should have thought of it.  "Autogynephilic." That's what I am.
 
-![notebook: THERE'S A WORD FOR IT ...]({filename}/images/getting_it_right_1.png)
+![notebook: THERE'S A WORD FOR IT ...]({static}/images/getting_it_right_1.png)
 
 And:
 
 > Scarcity is a _metaphysical_ fact, so why am I hurt when my word (which I didn't invent & only discovered a few hours ago) has so many connotations attached to it that I don't like? The dictionary definition is perfect for me, but all the exposition after that has to do with transsexualism, which annoys me, although thinking of it now, I suppose it would seem to be a logical extension to some. I'm autogynephilic _without_ being gender-dysphoric—_or am I?_ _If_ transitioning cheap & fast & painless & perfect—wouldn't I at least be tempted? What I can't stand is transsexuals who want to express the man/woman they "truly are inside"—because I don't think there's any such thing. It _has_ to be about sex—because gender shouldn't exist.
 
-![notebook: so why am I hurt when my word ...]({filename}/images/getting_it_right_2.png)
+![notebook: so why am I hurt when my word ...]({static}/images/getting_it_right_2.png)
 
-![notebook: that I don't like ...]({filename}/images/getting_it_right_3.png)
+![notebook: that I don't like ...]({static}/images/getting_it_right_3.png)
 
 <a id="views-have-changed"></a>My views on gender have changed a _lot_ over the past ten years—most notably, I'm not a psychological sex differences denialist anymore, so I'm afraid I can no longer endorse that "gender shouldn't exist" stance. (Given that sex differences exist and people aren't going to _pretend not to notice_, social-role defaults are inevitably going to accrete around them.)