X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=content%2Fdrafts%2Fa-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md;h=8f745f097a047fbc76200de9cea9769fcbf51451;hp=fdc264fea4349d1b9be7b5833e6eb00ac13970df;hb=8383bb88a415412c449dbf491f6ceaf2e684be63;hpb=3a266c16c65d62ecf3dc227c79cca7049280e0e1 diff --git a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md index fdc264f..8f745f0 100644 --- a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md +++ b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md @@ -320,3 +320,16 @@ As far as I can tell, Professor, I'm just doing what _you_ taught me—carve rea > decision-theoretically, it's also not their fault. They were all following a strategy that was perfectly reasonable until they ran into someone with an anomalously high insistence that words should mean things Sure: everyone in a conflict thinks they're acting defensively against aggressors infringing on their rights, because in the cases where everyone agrees what the "actual" property rights are, there's no conflict. + +typographic attack: https://openai.com/blog/multimodal-neurons/ + +https://distill.pub/2021/multimodal-neurons/ +> These neurons detect gender^10 +> Footnote: By this, we mean both that it responds to people presenting as this gender, as well as that it responds to concepts associated with that gender. + +https://www.jefftk.com/p/an-update-on-gendered-pronouns + +> Still think this was a perfectly fine tweet btw. Some people afaict were doing the literal ontologically confused thing; seemed like a simple thing to make progress on. Some people wanted to read it as a coded statement despite all my attempts to narrow it, but what can you do. +https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1356535300986523648 + +If you were actually HONESTLY tring to narrow it, you would have said, "By the way, this is just about pronouns, I'm not taking a position on whether trans women are women"