X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=content%2Fdrafts%2Fa-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md;h=f294089491ef88daea1f6a3ad4b93d2677e30c52;hp=7ee3ebe5ca460215ca279161fe387c9e08a9d5a3;hb=ec4625c30a09e1008679c8fdda4038ca1f786d1e;hpb=acaf7ea3e9a145413eddcfb90d695099b20809bb

diff --git a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
index 7ee3ebe..f294089 100644
--- a/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
+++ b/content/drafts/a-hill-of-validity-in-defense-of-meaning.md
@@ -992,6 +992,8 @@ https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1404700330927923206
 
 I mean, I wouldn't _call_ it a "dark conspiracy" exactly, but if the people with intellectual authority are computing what to say on the principle of "it is sometimes personally prudent and not community-harmful to post [their] agreement with Stalin", and Stalin cares a lot about doing damage on issues legible and important to me, then, pragmatically, I think that has _similar effects_ on the state of our collective knowledge as a dark conspiracy, even if the mechanism of coordination is each individual being separately terrified of Stalin, rather than them meeting with dark robes to plot under a full moon.
 
+[when you consider the contrast between how Yudkowsky talks about sex differences, and how he panders to trans people—that really does look like he's participating in a conspiracy to do damage on issues legible to me; if there's no conspiracy, how else am I supposed to explain the difference?]
+
 ]
 
 [TODO: sneering at post-rats; David Xu interprets criticism of Eliezer as me going "full post-rat"?!