X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fa-hill-marketing.txt;h=aae747605846a186b21f8e7316f461b1457245b0;hp=5a063d884e01ac9fb12907882345b5f18cc14492;hb=b72177105714e1be3754da947be520a3b3dc6859;hpb=a99289a9d3aab597be0ef06bbcf7e312570f5fa5 diff --git a/notes/a-hill-marketing.txt b/notes/a-hill-marketing.txt index 5a063d8..aae7476 100644 --- a/notes/a-hill-marketing.txt +++ b/notes/a-hill-marketing.txt @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ But if I unblock and tag him, then I'm effectively bidding for his attention, wh (Really, that's _also_ why I'm publishing the comment. I tried talking to the guy _first_, a lot, before eventually concluding (after using up what I assume is my lifetime supply of Eliezer-bandwidth) that it's a waste of time. My final email to him said, "I think the efficient outcome here is that I tell the Whole Dumb Story on my blog and never bother you again", and even if that wasn't a _promise_, it seems healthier to basically stick to that—I mean, like, I said a few words to him about _Planecrash_ at the anti-smallpox party, but my position is that that doesn't count as "bothering him" in the relevant sense.) -If he _wants_ to engage to defend his reputation, that's _great_—I would actually prefer that—but I don't want it to look like I'm trying to demand that, or threaten him into more engagement: rather, the function of the comment is to explain to _everyone else_ why I, in fact, don't trust him anymore, which is something I seflishly want them to know. +If he _wants_ to engage to defend his reputation, that's _great_—I would actually prefer that—but I don't want it to look like I'm trying to demand that, or threaten him into more engagement: rather, the function of the comment is to explain to _everyone else_ why I, in fact, don't trust him anymore, which is something I seflishly want them to know before the world ends probably the right move is to unblock and tag, but then explain the "stabs you in the front" rationale in a followup Tweet?