X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fa-hill-of-validity-sections.md;fp=notes%2Fa-hill-of-validity-sections.md;h=fa7c8755dc729ff3927c4bc22fdde1863c98a827;hp=d5a7167c9964923e1284eed956c2256c2b1c4fa9;hb=2b3a0470e3f115540a749fd76903a2a53ef196c9;hpb=5c15cd566ecbc26c30b4f28a017f85ca2fcca788

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index d5a7167..fa7c875 100644
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -82,6 +82,8 @@ _ maybe Kelsey (very briefly, just about her name)?
 _ maybe SK (briefly about his name)? (the memoir might have the opposite problem (too long) from my hostile-shorthand Twitter snipes)
 (maybe don't bother with Michael?)
 
+_ should I buy Twitter ads to increase reach??
+
 things to bring up in consultation emails—
 _ dropping "and Scott" in Jessica's description of attacking narcissim
 _ I think it's OK to copy my friends' language from emails; plagiarism instincts
@@ -1483,3 +1485,9 @@ _socially load-bearing_ philosophy mistake.
 I currently write "trans woman", two words, as a strategic concession to the shibboleth-detectors of my target audience:[^two-words] I don't want to to _prematurely_ scare off progressive-socialized readers on account of mere orthography, when what I actually have to say is already disturbing enough.)
 
 [^two-words]: For the unfamiliar: the [doctrine here](https://medium.com/@cassiebrighter/please-write-trans-women-as-two-words-487f153444fb) is that "transwoman" is cissexist, because "trans" is properly an adjective indicating a type of woman.
+
+Alicorn writes (re Kelsey's anorexia): "man it must be so weird to have a delusion and know it's a delusion and still have it"
+what's really weird is having a delusion, knowing it's a delusion, and _everyone else_ insists your delusion is true
+... and I'm not allowed to say that without drawing on my diplomacy budget, which puts a permanent distance between me and the group
+
+you can't imagine contemporary Yudkowsky adhering to Crocker's rules  (http://sl4.org/crocker.html)