X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fa-hill-of-validity-sections.md;h=59c6b639746fc957b9463cb413f35bfb198f894c;hp=06d5daab0d09281d6d2f8b39125574ce7dcbf96b;hb=a70e029bfeb9bafeedc585ff552c74f93efe31ff;hpb=069e5af88c2cd534e64f1d45602843b61bfcbc4e

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index 06d5daa..59c6b63 100644
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -238,6 +238,7 @@ I got a pingback to "Optimized Propaganda" from in an "EDIT 5/21/2021" on https:
 
 https://slatestarcodex.com/2020/02/10/autogenderphilia-is-common-and-not-especially-related-to-transgender/
 
+https://twitter.com/HiFromMichaelV/status/1221771020534788098
 "Rationalism starts with the belief that arguments aren't soldiers, and ends with the belief that soldiers are arguments."
 
 The Eliezer Yudkowsky I remember wrote about [how facts are tightly-woven together in the Great Web of Causality](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/wyyfFfaRar2jEdeQK/entangled-truths-contagious-lies), such that [people who are trying to believe something false have an incentive to invent and spread fake epistemology lessons](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/XTWkjCJScy2GFAgDt/dark-side-epistemology), and about the [high competence threshold that _forces_ correct conclusions](http://sl4.org/archive/0602/13903.html).
@@ -1148,4 +1149,17 @@ The McGongall turning into a cat parody may actually be worth fitting in—McCon
 
  * https://everythingtosaveit.how/case-study-cfar/#attempting-to-erase-the-agency-of-everyone-who-agrees-with-our-position  
 
-Michael on EA suppressing credible criticism https://twitter.com/HiFromMichaelV/status/1559534045914177538
\ No newline at end of file
+Michael on EA suppressing credible criticism https://twitter.com/HiFromMichaelV/status/1559534045914177538
+
+"epistemic hero"
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1096769579362115584
+
+zinger from 93—
+> who present "this empirical claim is inconsistent with the basic tenets of my philosophy" as an argument against the _claim_
+
+reply to my flipping out at Jeff Ladish
+https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1356493440041684993
+
+We don't believe in privacy 
+> Privacy-related social norms are optimized for obscuring behavior that could be punished if widely known [...] an example of a paradoxical norm that is opposed to enforcement of norms-in-general").
+https://unstableontology.com/2021/04/12/on-commitments-to-anti-normativity/