X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fa-hill-of-validity-sections.md;h=b206e720a65d51b9bba31b99f6b63757a23b1a92;hp=86e5df906f6becebf295fddcb711049cbd600ec1;hb=d4b2fdc8ff8e5e1d0f005abde10f03341f8cfc48;hpb=727b5ef1bea2b91b7d29a493b35dfe9c41426f6c

diff --git a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
index 86e5df9..b206e72 100644
--- a/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
+++ b/notes/a-hill-of-validity-sections.md
@@ -1037,3 +1037,5 @@ https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mmHctwkKjpvaQdC3c/what-should-you-change-in-resp
 The HEXACO personality model considers "honesty" and "humility" a single factor
 
 I'm not usually—at least, not always—so much of a scrub as to play chess with a pigeon (which shits on the board and then struts around like it's won), or wrestle with a pig (which gets you both dirty, and the pig likes it), or dispute what the Tortise said to Achilles
+
+(You might group things together _on the grounds_ of their similarly positive consequences—that's what words like _good_ do—but that's distinct from choosing _the categorization itself_ because of its consequences.)