X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fa-hill-twitter-reply.md;h=60cb875a7b0b3089f25652661268dde3be438931;hp=e9fd01c084bd04f913d3d8fd6969185ed22b97ae;hb=cb4c41507e8f8cd97861b4a9953166c609b1fb0e;hpb=794333a3296c35d2474b2efaef032e79c4f09b63 diff --git a/notes/a-hill-twitter-reply.md b/notes/a-hill-twitter-reply.md index e9fd01c..60cb875 100644 --- a/notes/a-hill-twitter-reply.md +++ b/notes/a-hill-twitter-reply.md @@ -1,10 +1,5 @@ 28 November 2018 - - - - - [TODO: "not ontologically confused" concession] It's true that I was _originally_ thinking about all this in the context of autogynephilia and Blanchard's proposed two-type taxonomy. But the philosophical issues at hand here are _way_ more general than that specific hypothesis, and I think Yudkowsky _already_ had more than enough evidence—if [used efficiently](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/MwQRucYo6BZZwjKE7/einstein-s-arrogance)—to see that the distribution of actual trans people we know is such that the categories-are-not-abritrary point is relevant in practice.