X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fchess_tweet.txt;fp=notes%2Fchess_tweet.txt;h=230f464655f7873bc578ab149524a2ef5673aed2;hp=0000000000000000000000000000000000000000;hb=01b1fb8c390360a7ee3d95b84fb3c949e628cdae;hpb=130df5837046169ad7f9c8fd2b4e32dcd7a686de

diff --git a/notes/chess_tweet.txt b/notes/chess_tweet.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..230f464
--- /dev/null
+++ b/notes/chess_tweet.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+I kind of feel the same way about @ESYudkowsky's November 2018 claim that "you're not standing in defense of truth if you insist on a word, brought explicitly into question, being used with some particular meaning". 1/
+
+https://twitter.com/balajis/status/1278756836292751361
+
+
+Source: https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/1067198993485058048
+Archived:
+
+It's true that words don't have intrinsic defintions; however, as @ESYudkowsky
+
+[not yet; I will be patient]