X-Git-Url: http://unremediatedgender.space/source?p=Ultimately_Untrue_Thought.git;a=blobdiff_plain;f=notes%2Fhuman-diversity-notes.md;h=1d11e98e07857173f700073e42de56d1bbe119c6;hp=1e8dfff3d5831aa186f0609216d3df289e02731e;hb=168f70cf80cfcb76086b86081c67e8a619c993d5;hpb=2887865aa55465e5de473d16f361c3ebbaa94c3d

diff --git a/notes/human-diversity-notes.md b/notes/human-diversity-notes.md
index 1e8dfff..1d11e98 100644
--- a/notes/human-diversity-notes.md
+++ b/notes/human-diversity-notes.md
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
  * A few things are actually _worse_ than the ball-hiders make it seem ("treat ppl as individuals" doesn't work; "IQ isn't morally valuable" doesn't work)
  * Embryo selection looks _really important_; I don't want to give amunition to racists, but I need to talk about that—and the recent Dawkins brouhaha says we can't even talk about that; and the ways I'm worried about eugenics being misused aren't even on the radar
 
+* need to talk about individual differences being non-threatening
+
 Galileo and Darwin weren't _trying_ to undermine Christianity—they had much more interesting things to think about—but religious authorities were _right_ to fear heliocentrism and evolution: if the prevailing coordination equilibrium depends on lies, then telling the truth _is_ a threat and it _is_ disloyal. And if the prevailing coordination equilibrium is basically _good_, then you can see why purported truth-tellers striking at the heart of the faith might be believed to be evil.
 
 Instead of just getting _the right answer for the right reasons_ (which can conclude _conditional_ answers: if what humans are like depends on _choices_ about what we teach our children, then there will still be a fact of the matter as to what choices lead to what outcomes), everyone and her dog has some fucking _agenda_.